Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 2-9 <br />IMPACT SUMMARY <br />Impacts to sorts, vegetation, surface <br />water, groundwater from accidental <br />spills or pipeline rupture, and <br />czposttres to wildlife <br />Risk associatedwith human-caused <br />wildfires; well-field development; <br />product or gasoline leakage; methane <br />gas seepage <br />Compliance wtdt start <br />and Pederal <br />regulations would <br />result in minor <br />potential for localized <br />impacts; wildlife <br />impacts monitored and <br />mitigated, if <br />necessary. <br />subcontractors, and <br />the public would be <br />similar to those <br />associated with heavy <br />construction and <br />industry. <br />Compliance with start <br />and Pederal <br />regulations would <br />result in minor <br />potential for localized <br />impacts; wildlife <br />impacts monitored and <br />mitigated, if <br />necessary. <br />KI5K5 to employees, <br />subcontractors, and <br />the public would be <br />similar to those <br />associated with heavy <br />construction and <br />industry. <br />slate and Pederal <br />regulations would <br />resultin minor <br />potential (or localized <br />impacts; wildlife <br />impacts monitored <br />and mitigated, if <br />necessary. <br />Ktsks to employees, <br />subcontractors and <br />the public would be <br />similar to those <br />associated with heavy <br />construction and <br />industry. <br />Similar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would be <br />slightly higher. <br />Similar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would be <br />slightly higher. <br />Similar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would be <br />slightly higher. <br />Similar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would be <br />slightly higher. <br />mmnar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would be <br />slightly higher. <br />Slmdar to Proposed <br />Action, although the <br />probability of <br />incidence would 6e <br />slightly higher. <br />No Action Alternative. Potential short-temt, minor impacts as a result of the No Action Alternative would include deer/vehicle collisions, hazardous materials spills, and employee health and safely impacts <br />during closure of the lest mine facility. The pipeline would not be constmcted and therefore, no cultural surveys would be performed and additional knowledge of the area would not be gained. <br />Socioeconomic benefits of employment, earnings, tax revenues and royalties would not be realized. BI.M's sodium management objectives o((acililating the development of sodium resources would not be <br />met. <br />Sheet 12 of 12 <br /> <br />