GENERAL49575

• Permit No: M1999002
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 1/19/1999
• Doc Name: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 2
• From: STIEGERS CORP
• To: DMG
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

TABLE 2-9
IMPACT SUMMARY

:.....:::.:.:.:..::.::.:.:.....b o .: trots:;.::::::::::::: :::,:::::::::::•::::::.::•:::::::::::
::::::::::.:;.:::::::::::..;:.:;.;. veb me ..::.:.....:.
.cseeca nt:•:::.::::::.:-:.:.::.:...;::.:.;,..,.....::::
t ten al lm actb .:Ruwtiirie ::::::
.. TYpe:a.;Pp....;:H:..;;:.:.. p::,..:.;:I'..:.:::, :.::::.::.:.:::.: .:::::::: Picesriee 51te `::'::•' ::::::::';.:'tPi eliris:':::::::.
.:::.:::.:.::.:::..,.::...:.:..::: :..::::::.:::.:::.;:p::.::.:::::::::.;:::.; :'::.::::Eer~aetiuie:Site::::::
:.:.:.:.;....::::::;:.>:::.:.::.:::::;:::: :::::'::INee6nca 91ie.::;.
::..::::::::::::;:.;:::::.:::::::::::::: :::.':::'::': PE etine.':;.' :;::;;:::; ;9:ti;:;ParsrBnt 1 ::"::.
:::.... ...:...P.:..:..:.:......::..:.:........:.:.:..:.:..:....e $ te..:::..

,.
::.:.s :::.::.:::.:.:::.::.:.:.::.:.:......::..::..:::.. : :.:::.::::::.::.:::.:::::..::::..y sb
i aiResiiti

ree§'C6iitinutil"'.::::'.::

:':::'::' :.:::::::::::':::::.':::;:::::i:::

::'::<::'::;;.:.::::::::.:::.:::::::::::•.:: :::::.:>:::::;::-:
Visibility of disturbance areas Piceance Creek Road Views of pipeline Highly visible to Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed
viewers would have would be scattered travelers along the Action, but with a Action Action
views of well pads, across Project Area. Parachute Creek larger area of
wells and pipe racks. Areas with the most Road and from disturbance visible at
Viewer orientation viewers include the locations in any one time, .vhich
would prevent views Piceance Creek Road Battlement Mesa, would draw more
of processing plant Crossings (mileposts 2 located about 4 miles viewer attention.
and evaporation pond. and 14), and locations south of site.
Travelers on the along the Parachute
Yellow Crcck Jeep Creek Road.
Trail would drive
through the site and
have views of most
project facilities. Use
of this road is minor.
~::: ~ :::..:..::::..:.::. ~.:..........;::.::::.~ :::: ~~~ ::~.: ~: ~.~ ~.: ~.::~:;.::::::; ;:::~;:::.::..:.::..:. ~~::::.~: ~:.~ ~::~;::::::: ~ :.~ ::::;.:::.:'::.::::;:~':.~:::;'Su

.. .......... .. ...... .:.. .... ...:...:.:
. ....... ........ ... .. .
.:..............:.:..:.. .. ...: .. .. ...:..
• Employment During construction, a A peak of I50 During constmction, During construction, a Same as Proposed During construction, a
peak of 161 workers. construction workers. a peak of 189 peak of 322 workers. Action peak of 380 workers.
About 95 would be The average workers. About I IS About 195 would be Almost 230 would be
non-local. During workforce would be would benon-local. non-local. During non-local. During
operations, there ISO individuals. During operations, operations, there operations, there
would be 75 there would be 85 would be 170 would be 170
individuals and most individuals and most individuals and most individuals and most
would be locally would be locally would be locally would be locally
hired. hired. hired. hired.
• Earnings Total construction based on a labor effort Total construction Total construction Same as Proposed Total construction
salaries would be $14 of 200,000 hours, salaries would be $14 salaries would be Action salaries would be
miiiion. Operators consvuaion workers miiiion. Operaturs aouw ato uumuu. auum .eco uuuwu.
would make $3.3 would eam $B million. would make about Operators would make Operators would make
million each year. $3.7 million each over $7 million each over S7 million each
year. year. year.
Sheet 8 of 12