GENERAL49575

• Permit No: M1999002
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 1/19/1999
• Doc Name: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 2
• From: STIEGERS CORP
• To: DMG
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

TABLE 2-9
IMPACT SUMMARY
p..:::::.:: cce era ....:.. eve opmegt .: :::: :.::.: .: ::: :•:
.::
......... ...:....... .
ot:p ...;
T a
ten a act b esource ...:.:
Yp? :...............P.....y......... ..: ......:
::::
.:.:...: i : ;.;::::...:.- :. ... ....:....:...
:::. Ereeance...tc....:.. ...::.:Plpelrne::::.-.: Neeachutq:SiM.:::::.
:::....
:.::-;::.Pfeeance.57te'::;..:.
.......... .
,.
::;::.':::::.::Pi elirie;:''.:;.:::::' .:..::-Pararh..icfe:S.lte: ':

:
:
:..::......:.....::.................:.:::.:...:....:.......:::.:..LandUsA:ariA 6erratioa.::;::.::::.:::.'::.::::.:::...:.;:..-.:.;:;:..::.:,,;;.
...... .::::...:;.:;..: ::::
.:.:.:::,.::;:.:.:.::•.
:.::'.:::;:::
,.::.:
• Conflict with adopted land use policies Project does not Project dots not Projcet does not Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed
conflict with land use con0icl with land use conpict with land use Ac[ion Ac[ion Action
politics or goals o(the policies or goals of the policies or goals of
BI.M, or Rio Blanco BLM, or Rio Blanco the BLM, or Rio
and Garfield counties. and Garfield counties. Blanco and Garfield
Would require Cederal Would require federal counties. Would
and local special use and local special use require federal end
permits. pertnils. local special use
permits.
• Effects on existing land use Minor impacts to No significant change No significant change Minor impacts to No significant change No significant change
forage availability forage availability
(loss o(6 AUMs) and (loss of 13 AUMs).
some loss in hunting Greater area of deer
opportunities, displacement and lost
hunting opportunities.
• E(fecls to Ryen Gulch ACEC Would not meet BLM No efTecl No effect Same as Proposed No etTect No effect
land management Action
policies. Available
mitigations ntay put
project in compliance
with management
goals (or the ACEC.
sua esaurces:::.-;::.:.':" ::::::::::.:.:::...::.::::.:..:::...-.....-::;:.;....,......:
..............
• ECfects to the existing scenic quality Physical alteration of Mostly an incremental No major eltange to Same as Proposed Same as Proposed Same as Proposed
the existing landscape increase in the Ilte existing visual Action, but with a Action Action
would he substantial existing line, color, quality. greater area of
in some areas, and texture contrasts disturbance.
changing a mostly caused by existing
natural appearing pipeline ROWS.
landscape to an
industrial site.
Sheet 7 of 12