My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49575
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:29:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 5:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/19/1999
Doc Name
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHAPTER 2
From
STIEGERS CORP
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CNAPTERTWO Proposed Action and Alternawes <br />The groundwater well sample analytical results and water level measurements would be reported <br />to BLM on a monthly basis and to EPA on a quarterly basis. <br />2.2.5.4 Evaporation Pond Monitoring <br />The evaporation ponds to be located at the Piceance Site and the Parachute Site are described in <br />Section 2.2.1.2 and Section 2.2.3.2, respectively. Monitoring of overflow from the ponds would <br />occur on a daily basis by visual inspection. Although overflows are not expected because <br />adequate freeboazd would be incorporated into all pond designs, any overflows would be <br />reported to the BLM within 72 hours. <br />Total dissolved solids and pH in the Piceance Site evaporation pond, the Parachute evaporation <br />pond, and the Pazachute MVR purge pond would be measured and recorded every 6 months. <br />Results would be included in the periodic (monthly or quarterly) reporting to BLM, EPA, and <br />CDMG. <br />2.2.5.5 Air Emission Source Monitoring <br />A construction pernut application, including a fugitive dust control plan, would tie filed with the <br />Air Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment <br />(CDPHE) for each significant source of air pollutants at each site prior to construction. The <br />sources at the Piceance and Parachute sites would be reviewed in accordance with the provisions <br />for prevention of significant deterioration. Following construction, a renewable operating permit <br />application (Title V) would also be filed for each site. The emissions from each :;ire would be <br />monitored as necessary to demonstrate compliance with the permit provisions. <br />During construction and operation, water would be applied as necessary to roads and cleazed <br />azeas for dust control. Routine dust control on roads and cleazed azeas would be :provided by <br />watering trucks. <br />2.2.5.6 Wildlife Recovery and Replacement Plan <br />Three primary wildlife concerns have been identified for the Yankee Gulch Project, including <br />impacts to mule deer, potential impacts to migratory birds that may utilize project ponds, and <br />potential impacts to sage grouse resulting from pipeline construction. American .soda is <br />consulting with BLM, Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), and US Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (USFWS) to develop final plans to address these concems. Based on initial <br />consultations, the following describe the general measures that American Soda would <br />implement. <br />Mu/e Deer <br />A deer habitat improvement program would be implemented at the Piceance `fire with the <br />goal of providing sufficient overwintering and transitional habitat to support <ieer displaced <br />by the project. <br />2-22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.