My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49192
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:34 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:55:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/23/1982
Doc Name
MLRB PN C-028-81
From
ADOLPH COORS CO
To
MLR
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(which can not be readily identified as separate species when intermixed) should <br />be, and have been, established at RI between 2 and 407. The potential problem <br />is that of establishing a second cool-season grass species at RI of 2 to 4GJ. <br />Coors should propose that the combined RI of the four introduced species used as <br />a substitute for needleandthread should be considered as a single component in <br />meeting the requirement. Ideally, the four introduced species xould provide a <br />combined RI of about 6%, but no one of the £our would exceed 2%. <br />To provide the forb component, the revised seed mixture includes alfalfa, cicer <br />milk.vetch and bractless stickleaf, Consider, once again, Table 2.04,10(4 as <br />proposed for revision on page 2. 4Jestern ragweed, which is an invader, had an <br />RI of Ef%, but Coors certainly doesn't ~aant to replace that undesirable species. <br />Othero-rise, four non-invader type (orbs had AI of 1% each, and these are the species <br />for which Coors will substitute alfalfa, ciczr milkvetch and bractless stickleaf. <br />Ideally, the three substitutes would provide a combined RI of about 4% with none <br />of the three exceeding 2~. Consequently, Coors should propose that the combined <br />RI of the three fortis should be considered as a single component in meeting the forb <br />requirement. <br />I have discussed these problems on the basis that the RI range of 3 to 40% might <br />be changed to a range of 2 to 4~, as supported by Table 2.04,10(4), However, <br />Coors need not he greatly concerned about whether the minimum RI is 2 or 3"J. <br />Confidence limits for a binomial distribution, even at 95o probability with a <br />sample size of 250, make these minimal RI about equally attainable. These <br />confidence limits, along with details of sample size and data interpretation, <br />should be included in the new draft of Section 2.04,10(4)e Species Diversity. <br />Sincerely, <br />71.7~~r-d~vz, <br />t.' <br />D. I7, Hyder <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.