My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL49126
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL49126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:27:15 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:52:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/1/1989
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br /> <br />so impacts up to the present time have been negligible or <br />nonexistent. At the Coal Ridge No. 1 operation, all runoff is <br />routed into a sediment pond. Very few discharges have taken place, <br />and there have been no NPDES water quality exceedences. The Coal <br />Ridge sediment control system shall remain in place until <br />revegetation standards are met, so the operation should contribute <br />little suspended sediment to the Colorado River. There is <br />therefore little or no potential for cumulative impacts from the <br />two mines on surface water quality. <br />The containment of nearly all disturbed-area surface runoff by <br />sediment ponds at both operations reduces surface water quantity in <br />Harvey Gap drainage and in the Colorado River to an extent. <br />However, the total disturbed area is only 49.5 acres (12 acres at <br />Eastside and 37.5 acres at Coal Ridge), compared to the drainage <br />area for the Colorado River at Glenwood Springs of 6,013 square <br />miles. Water in the Harvey Gap and Colorado River alluvial bodies <br />is hydraulically connected to the associated surface stream. <br />Surface water and alluvial ground water quantity reductions are <br />therefore negligible. <br />In conclusion, coal mining at the Eastside and Coal Ridge No. 1 <br />operations is not expected to cumulatively impact the quality or <br />quantity of ground water or surface water of the Colorado River <br />Basin. The Division finds the operations proposed at the Coal <br />Ridge No. 1 Mine have been designed to prevent material damage to <br />the hydrologic balance outside the permit area. <br />4. <br />The Division finds that the permit area is, subject to valid rights <br />existing as of August 3, 1977, not within: <br />a) An area designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(i)); <br />b) An area under study far designation as unsuitable for surface coal <br />mining operations (2.07.6(2)(d)(ii)); <br />c) The boundaries of the National Park System, the National Wildlife <br />Refuge Sy stem, the National System of Trails, the National <br />Wilderness Preservation System, the Wild and Scenic Rivers System <br />including rivers under study for designation, and National <br />Recreation Areas (2.07 .6 (2 )(d)(iii)(A)); <br />d) Three hundred feet of any <br />community or institutional <br />(2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(B)); <br />public building, school, church, <br />building, or public park <br />e) One hundred feet of a cemetary (2.07 .6 (2 )(d)(iii)(C)); <br />f) The boundaries of any National Forest unless the required finding <br />of compatibility has been made by the Secretary of the U.S. <br />Department of Agriculture. (2.07.6(2)(d)(iii)(D)); <br />-10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.