My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48692
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:25:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:30:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-15- <br />It has been brought to the attention of the Division by the State Engineer's <br />Office that the work area sediment pond might not be capable of releasing <br />stored water in excess of 2 acre feet within 36 hours in accordance with <br />C.R.S. 1973 37-87-122(3). (See Attachment No. 3 of this document.) Based <br />on information presented in Annexure H of-the application, it does appear <br />that the storage volume below the elevation of the dewatering device is in <br />excess of 2 acre feet. The following stipulation is necessary. <br />Stipulation No. 2 <br />WITHIN TWO MONTHS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE THE PERMITTEE MUST PRESENT INFORMATION <br />~ THE DIVISION DEMONSTRATING .THAT THE WORK AREA SEDIMENT POND IS <br />CAPABLE OF RELEASING STORED WATER IN EXCESS OF 2 ACRE FEET WITHIN 36 HOURS <br />OR SUBMIT RN APPROPRIATE APPLICATION FOR A COURT APPROVED AUGMENTATION <br />PLAN TO REPLACE THE WATER S2t~RED OUT OR PRIORITY. <br />Based on personal correspondence with Mr, Jim Hall of the State Engineer's <br />Office, it has been determined that no augmentation plan will be necessary <br />for water which "flows to the bottom of the pit" as is indicated in <br />Attachment No. 3. Runoff from above is diverted around the active pit. water <br />which accumulates in the bottom of the pit is limited to precipitation <br />within the boundaries of the pit and is rapidly Zost to infiltration or <br />evaporation. <br />Rules 4.05.3 and 4.05.4 provide performance standards for stream diversions <br />and stream channel reconstruction. Exhibit 7 of the original permit application <br />contains discharge calculations and post-mining cross-sections. In response <br />to concerns expressed by the Division in the preliminary findings document <br />of December lI, 1981 the applicant has revised Map Z9 (May, 1982) to show <br />the reoonstructed stream channels and the reaches of stream that would be <br />rock lined, has provided additional calculations concerning the sizing of <br />the reconstructed stream channel and diversions (January, 1982 and September, <br />1982), and has provided information concerning. the sizing, placement, and <br />selection of riprap for the channels (September, 1982). <br />AZZ pre-mining stream channels, with the exception of some minor drainages__ <br />filled-in by the Streeter Fill, will be restored to their approximate historic <br />location after mining. The other recronstructed stream channels and the <br />Streeter Gulch permanent div_ers~~are a~I_sized to pass the 100-year_event._ - - <br />(EVen'though the ZO-year event would be sufficient in some cases.) Those <br />reaches of channel in which the design velocity exceeds_5_fps_wi11 be <br />riprapped with material 1 1/2' to 4' in diameter. The Division finds that <br />the channel re_a?nstruction_plan is_satisfactory_with_regard_to_the_performance <br />standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.