My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL48294
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL48294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:24:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 4:13:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/24/2006
Doc Name
Aspen Study Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Seneca Coal Company
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Aspen Study Review Comments <br />Aspen Study Plan <br />The detailed first year study plan is included in Appendix 22-3 of the Seneca II-W permit <br />application package, Aspen Study Plan. The study design included four blocks of aspen <br />transplants (50 per block), within each of two soil treatments, "modified" (i.e. <br />rotocleared) and "normal" (i.e. non-rotocleared). The soil for each treatment was <br />obtained from an aspen grove in advance of mine operations, and was replaced at an <br />approximately uniform 4 foot thickness. The blocks within each soil treatment included a <br />high, medium, and low irrigation rate treatment, and a control, which received no <br />supplemental irrigation. Although not formally addressed in the study plan, the elk <br />fenced study plot included substantial azea within each soil treatment that was not <br />irrigated or planted with aspen saplings. It was anticipated that some aspen sprouting <br />from root segments within the replaced topsoil might occur, and that the extent of <br />suckering might differ between the two soil treatments. in addition to the detailed first <br />year "pilot study" plan and schedule for transplanting aspen using drip irrigation, the <br />Appendix addresses, in Section 8.0, additional techniques to be field tested including the . <br />"mother plant technique" and the "aspen sapling farm". <br />Commitments regarding future management and research associated with the aspen study <br />are addressed in Section 7.0 and Section 9.0 of permit Appendix 22-3. In section 7.0, the <br />plan notes that "iffirst-season drip irrigation proves to be successful in allowing aspen to <br />survive transplanting, additional reseazch might be necessary...". Potential topics for <br />continued research are stated to include: <br />• How long will supplemental irrigation be necessary? <br />• Will transplants be capable of re-establishing clones through root <br />suckering? <br />• What will be the long term growth and survival rates? <br />• What approaches will be necessary to "wean" transplants from <br />supplemental irrigation. <br />Within Section 7.0, SCC commits to submit information and/or requests for additional <br />study no later than December 2006, and further commits that supplemental irrigation will <br />continue through the 2006 field season at a level of irrigation to be determined by the <br />2005 study results. Within Section 9.0, SCC indicates that, if the studies and field trials <br />prove successful, "SCC will apply these techniques to the aspen establishment plots as <br />depicted in Exhibit 22-1 and 22-1A, Post Mine Vegetation Map". Section 9.0 contains <br />the further commitment that "SCC will make an evaluation of these trials and tests by the <br />fall of 2008". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.