Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DeUarlmenl of Natural Resources <br />131.7 Sherman sl., Ronm 215 <br />Denver, Cnlnwdn 8U_'Ol <br />Phone: 110 11 8fi6-3567 <br />F.~,%~. I A) 41 85'_-8106 <br />May 26, 1998 <br />Mr. William A. Bear Jr. <br />Bowie Resources Limited <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />P.O. Box 483 <br />Paonia, Colorado 81428 <br />r„ <br />II~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES_-_ <br />Koy Rnmer <br />Gmemw <br />tames 5 Lochhead <br />Execmroe Direcinr <br />Michel B. Lnng <br />Division Direcmr <br />RE: Fugitive Coal Dust, Bowie No. 2 Mine, Permit No. C-96-083, Bowie Resources Limited <br />Deaz Mr. Beaz: <br />As we discussed during the field inspection of May 21, 1998, the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology (the Division) received a phone call from a concemed citizen of the Paonia area. The <br />concerned parry stated that there has been truck traffic 24 hours a day along Highway 133 and <br />that coal dust has accumulated along Highway 133. Further, it was stated that coal dust was most <br />prevalent when the haul trucks were running empty. The concemed party, who requested <br />confidentiality, did not wish to file a formal, w7itten complaint at this time. Since the Division <br />believes that this issue involves the Bowie No. 2 Mine haul trucks and the Bowie No. 1 loadout, <br />both Bowie No. 1 and Bowie No. 2 aze receiving this letter. Also, Scott Miller of the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and Environment in Grand Junction is receiving a copy of this <br />litter. <br />The Division decided to investigate this matter during the week of May 18, 1998. Division <br />personnel observed the haul truck traffic between the Bowie No. 2 Mine and the Bowie No. 1 <br />loadout, as well as at the loadout, on Wednesday, May 20, 1998. This took place during dry <br />weather conditions. On the morning of Thursday, May 21, 1998, Division personnel observed the <br />same location during slightly wet conditions. The Division believes that the evidence shows that <br />fugitive coal dust has become a problem along the haulage route and at the Bowie No. 1 loadout. <br />The Division also believes that the evidence clearly shows that the Bowie No. 2 coal haul trucks <br />and the Bowie No. 1 loadout are the probable sources of this fugitive dust. <br />Concerning the amount of haul truck traffic on Highway 133, the Division does not have direct <br />jurisdiction in this matter. However, concemin~; the issue of fugitive coal dust. the Division has <br />the jurisdiction under Rules 4.01 and 4.17 to deal with this matter. <br />