Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />-4- <br />Section V -Revisions <br />C~ <br />A. Legal, Financial and Compliance - Information -Rule 2.03 <br />1. The name of the person who staff members should contact is listed as <br />Mr. Mitch Simmons. This should be changed to reflect the current <br />contact. The mine phone number is also incorrect. The application should <br />be reviewed for any other information which may have changed. Changes <br />should be made to reflect current information. <br />2. The Division requires an updated verification of insurance that meets <br />the coverage requirements of Rule 2.03.9. The existing insurance <br />certificate in the permit application has expired and should be updated. <br />3. During the permitting process the NPDES permit had not been issued <br />pending review by the Department of Health. This permit has since been <br />issued and a copy should be submitted to the Division. Any other changes <br />to the list of other licenses and permits should be noted (i.e., the <br />issuance of a permit to store, transport and use explosives). <br />B. Hydrologic Balance - Rules 2.04.5, 2.04.7, 2.05.6, and 4.05 <br />1. Except for the sulfide sampling in the spring of 1984, no ground water <br />monitoring data has been submitted to the Division since 1982. This data <br />should be submitted as it is collected as part of the ongoing monitoring <br />program. <br />2. Walden Coal Company states in the permit application that after a year <br />of monitoring they would request a reduction. No such request has been <br />received. Baseline conditions have been established and now is the time <br />to direct ongoing monitoring toward verification of the impacts due to <br />mining. If Walden Coal desires to reduce the monitoring program, they can <br />submit a plan as a technical revision for review by the Division. <br />E. Backfilling and Grading - Rules 2.05.3, 2.05.4, 4.09, 4.23 and 4.14 <br />1. In a letter dated June 1, 1982 from Robillard & Associated, Inc. to <br />Mr. Scott Patten concerning inspection of the East Dump, it is stated that <br />" an additional area of coal has been uncovered that was previously not <br />shown as known coal seam areas. This additional excavation will not pose <br />any problem with the reclamation plan except the final contours will not <br />reach the final elevations as shown on the plans." What does this <br />statement mean? How far off are the final contours as shown from the <br />expected final contours? <br />