My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47948
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:23:30 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:57:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/15/1982
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-46- <br />No information has been provided to indicate the presence or absence of <br />subirrigation in Santistevan Canyon. The information on alluvial ground water <br />included in the application is limited to the Picketwire Valley (Exhibit 6). <br />However, the presence of springs in Santistevan Canyon is shown on the USGS <br />topographic map of the area. Because of a lack of site specific information <br />and the presence of springs, the Division must assume that subirrigation does <br />occur in Santistevan Canyon, unless the permittee demonstrates the absence of <br />subirrigation in the canyon. <br />Based on the information provided, Santistevan Canyon is found to be an <br />alluvial valley floor based upon the capability for subirrigation. <br />Apache Canyon and Santistevan Canyon Findings <br />1. With the acceptance of Stipulation No. 12, the Division can find that <br />the proposed operation would not interrupt, discontinue or preclude farming on <br />the Apache Canyon or Santistevan Canyon alluvial valley floors. <br />The applicant has proposed no surface disturbance in Apache Canyon and <br />Santistevan Canyon. However, portions of the canyons are planned to be <br />undermined. The applicant has not projected the effects of full extraction <br />mining under Apache and Santistevan Canyons. Development mining should result <br />in no subsidence effects and, based on monitoring of inflows into mine <br />workings below Apache Canyon at the Allen and Maxwell Mines, development <br />mining will not significantly affect the alluvia] aquifers of Apache and <br />Santistevan Canyons. <br />2. With the acceptance of Stipulation No. 12, the Division can find that <br />the proposed operation would not cause material damage to the quantity and <br />quality of ground water that supplies the Apache Canyon and Santistevan Canyon <br />alluvial valley floors. <br />The applicant has proposed no surface disturbance in Apache Canyon and <br />Santistevan Canyon. Therefore, the proposed operation will not affect the <br />quality of water that supplies the alluvial valley floors. However, portions <br />of both canyons are planned to be undermined. The applicant has not projected <br />the effects of full extraction mining upon the alluvial valley floors. As <br />previously discussed, development mining will not result in significant <br />depletion of the alluvial aquifers of Apache and Santistevan Canyons. <br />3. With the acceptance of Stipulation No. 12, the Division can find that <br />the proposed mining operation would preserve the essential hydrologic <br />functions of the Apache Canyon and Santistevan Canyon alluvial valley floors. <br />The Division has conservatively assumed that Apache Canyon and Santistevan <br />Canyon are subirrigated alluvial floors significant to agriculture. <br />Therefore, the essential hydrologic function must be preserved throughout the <br />mining operation. The essential hydrologic functions are those geologic, <br />hydrologic, and topographic characteristics which make the ground water <br />usefully available for subirrigated agriculture. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.