My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47632
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:41:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/22/1982
Doc Name
BEAR MINE PERMIT REVIEW OUR FN C-033-81
From
MLR
To
BEAR COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M I'~ • • <br />/ F1r. CJilliam A. Bear -;- June 22, 1982 <br />Additional sediment control procedures including, but not limited to, gravelling <br />of the portal bench, grading of the portal bench so that drainage is directed <br />toward the highwall and not over the surface of the bench, vegetative stabili- <br />zation where practical, and a regular schedule for clean up of coal spilled <br />beneath the conveyor at the mine bench should be addressed. . <br />Ditches: <br />Two problens were noted i.~ith ditch designs; high flow velocities and lack o: <br />freeboard in the design. The size of rock riprap for Ditches A and B should <br />be specified. A D50 of at least 6" is necessary for Ditch B. Also, ditch <br />designs should be revised to incorporate at least o.: ft. of freeboard as <br />required by Rule 9.o5.J(6)(b). <br />stipulation No. 2 <br />The response to the potential flooding issue refers to the flood protection <br />afforded by Paonia Reservoir and the minimization o.` .`lood'potential r:hich <br />will be achieved as a result of the Highway Department's relocation. The <br />response states that "special attention wi1Z be given to reconstructing the <br />channel so that flood potential is minimized or completely eliminated." <br />The effects of the channel relocation on flooding (i.e., the flood event that <br />would be contained within the banks of the channelized river) should be <br />explained in more detail. <br />stipulation N'o. 3 <br />The response states that if water is encountered in the workings, it will be <br />routed to a sumo and NPDcs required parameters will be sampled prior to <br />discharging water to the surface. ~, plan drae~~ing should be provided c.~hich shows <br />the location of the sump(s) in the mine workings and details the desicn and <br />capacity of the sump(s). The response should si->ecifically er.nlain ho~o water <br />would be routed to and contained ;:~ithin the sunns, oiven the fact that rLLnir,g <br />is up-dip and water would r,aturallu drain toward the portals. <br />Stipulation No. 9 <br />The response states that a full gear of hudrologic data will be submitted in <br />August of 1983. It should be noted that the annual report required by the <br />stipulation is to be subru.tted each year of the permit term. <br />sti nulatior, IJO. S <br />The response satisfies the requirements of the stipulation. <br />stipulation No. 6 <br />Again, it is noted that the annual report is to be submitted each yea: of the <br />permit term. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.