My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:35:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/2006
Doc Name
Final EIS & Record of Decision for the Dry Fork Lease
From
US Forest Service
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Purpose and Need <br />Chapter 1 <br />unforeseen mining or geologic circumstances, coal <br />contract variability, etc. <br />Ark Land's application for the Dry Fork LBA tract <br />did not include foreseeable mining in the B Seam. <br />However, the BLM has documented possible <br />recoverable reserves in the B Seam. The coal lease, <br />if it is issued, will encompass all coal within the <br />lease boundaries. Therefore, although it is not <br />anticipated that the B Seam reserves would be <br />mined at this time, the RFMP includes a projection <br />for eventually mining in the B Seam. The B Seam <br />coal in the Dry Fork LBA may be mineable in the <br />northwestern portion of the tract. Longwall panels <br />would likely extend into these reserves from the <br />northwest. The B Seam coal reserves represent <br />about 14 months of additional coal reserves based <br />on the rate of mining currently employed at the <br />West Elk Mine. If the B Scam were ever to be <br />mined, it is presumed that it would be mined in a <br />similar fashion to the E Seam, from the existing <br />mine, and using existing facilities. <br />The RFMP assumes a longwall panel configuration <br />that would cross Deep Creek and the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek perpendicularly to obliquely. The <br />RFMP was used to develop the coal mine <br />subsidence prediction used to assess potential <br />surface resource impacts. A detailed subsidence <br />evaluation appears as Appendix B of the FEIS. <br />1.8.2 Reasonably Foreseeable Post- <br />lease Surface Use <br />In recent years, coal mines operating in the <br />Somerset coal field have experienced build-up of <br />methane gas in the underground workings after the <br />rock strata have subsided due to mining (see <br />Subsidence Evaluation, Appendix B). Under <br />Mining, Safety, and Health Administration <br />regulations, mines are required to maintain methane <br />levels at or below certain levels to ensure worker <br />safety underground. Typically, the mine ventilation <br />system cannot effectively keep methane levels <br />within safe working range, therefore additional <br />methane liberation methods are often used. <br />For mining on existing leases north of the Dry Fork <br />LBA tract, the West Elk Mine has used a system of <br />MDWs to assist in liberating methane from the <br />underground mine. These wells are drilled from the <br />land surface into the mine workings and use an <br />exhausting pump to pull gas from the mine. Drilling <br />these methane drainage wells requires construction <br />of drill pads and temporary roads on the land <br />surface. These features are on [he landscape for two <br />to six years, after which they are decommissioned, <br />and the land surface is reclaimed and returned to <br />pre-mining land uses. Reclamation includes <br />returning land surface to approximate original <br />contour and revegetating. Reclamation has been <br />generally successful within two to five years after <br />reclamation work is completed. <br />For the Dry Fork LBA tract, it is anticipated that <br />methane drainage wells may be needed. Other post- <br />leasing surface disturbance that could be reasonably <br />anticipated include, but is not limited to, <br />exploration drilling, seismic exploration, <br />groundwater monitor well installation, ventilation <br />and escapeway facilities, water handling facilities, <br />subsidence and hydrology monitoring facilities, and <br />access roads needed for these facilities (MCC <br />2003). Estimated acres by alternative are shown in <br />Table 1-1. <br />Table 1-1 <br />Reasonably Foreseeable Surface Use <br />Activity Alt. <br />B Alt. <br />C <br />MDW (number of) 30 22 <br />MDW (acres) 30 22 <br />Miles of temporary roads for MDW 4.4 2.9 <br />Temporary roads for MDW access <br />(acres) <br />16 <br />11 <br />Acres for ventilation (acres) 5 5 <br />Access for ventilation (acres) 3.5 3.5 <br />Total rounded acres 60 43 <br />MDW =Methane Drainage Wells <br />For the purposes of the effects analyses in this EIS, <br />it is assumed that surface disturbance would occur <br />periodically over the life of the lease (expected to <br />be about 25 years from lease issuance to lease <br />relinquishment and final bond release). Site-specific <br />locations of anticipated disturbance cannot be <br />iden[ifted at the leasing stage, due to the <br />competitive nature of coal leasing and the fact that a <br />1-8 Dry Fork Lease-By-Application FEIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.