My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47497
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47497
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:22:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:31:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/11/1999
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Legal description in permit application is out-of•date. The legal description in <br />the permit application is no longer accurate. Please provide an updated legal <br />description to ensure compliance with Section ?.03.6. <br />3. Permit does not specify a monitoring program for slump. Future bond release <br />for the slump parcel will depend on a demonstration of structural stability. <br />Historical monitoring data would be necessary in order to make such a <br />demonstration. The permit currently does not describe such a monitoring program; <br />therefore, the Division requests that a monitoring program be specified in the <br />permit application. <br />4. Permit does not accurately describe the hydrologic monitoring plan. The <br />permit application describes the monitoring plan that was followed prior to the <br />recent bond release. To ensure compliance with Section 2.05.6(3)(iv), please <br />update the description of the monitoring plan and explain the technical basis for <br />recent changes in the monitoring plan. <br />5. Permit does not identify current property ownership within and adjoining the <br />permit area. The description of property ownership within and adjoining the <br />permit area is no longer accurate. Please update this information to ensure <br />compliance with 2.10.3(1)(a). <br />6. Permit does not explain the bond release status of the ponds in the permit <br />area. The permit application does not adequately explain the reclamation status of <br />ponds I-1G-8 and 003. The Division has previously approved ponds HG-8 and 003 <br />as permanent ponds The ponds are no longer part of a mine sediment control <br />system, bu[ are watering ponds for wildlife and livestock . The land surrounding <br />the permit area is rangeland. No reclamation liability is associated with the ponds, <br />and the Division anticipates their discharges will be monitored only for NPDES <br />requirements. The 6.8-acre permit area comprises less than l `70 of the ponds' <br />drainage areas. Although the ponds comprise a substantial part of the remaining <br />6.8-acre permit area, the Division effectively has no jurisdiction over the ponds. <br />The sole purpose of maintaining a mining and reclamation permit on the two <br />parcels where the ponds are located is to achieve adequate shrub density. To avoid <br />confusion over the regulatory status of these ponds, the Division requests that an <br />explanation of the ponds' status be inserted in the permit application. <br />Hayden Gulch Mine Page 5 August 11, 1999 <br />Midterm Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.