GENERAL47388 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- ~ ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . - 999 THE ROCKCASTLE COMPANY December ~tL~;EIVED o~c io ~saa Mr. Dan Mathews Reclamation Specialist Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 305 Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Mr. Mathews: MINED LAND RECLAMATfON DIVISION Colo. Oepl of Natural Resources Re: The Rockcastl'e Company Grassy Gap Coal Mine Responses to Proposed Stipulation Following are Rockcastle Company's responses to proposed stipulations 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 on the Proposed Decision for Grassy Gap Mine. This is to be combined with Tommy Raye's responses dated November 26, 1984 on the remaining stipulation. As I indicated, we have not yet received confirmation of Wagner's equipment rates, but, at your suggestion, will forward them under separate cover to you when they arrive. Stipulation No. 8: Attached is a copy of plans and cross-sections for the reclaiming of sediment ponds at Pits 2 and 3. These were submitted originally at our meeting in Denver on November 2, 1984. Pit 4 sediment pond will be reclaimed in accordance with our application. The plans and cross-sections are designed to demonstrate compliance with Rule 4.14.1(2)(a) which specifies that spoil be "graded to eliminate all highwalls, spoil piles and depressions". Stipulation No. 10: Within 30 days of the publication of the CMLRD Board's decision, the application text will be updated to reflect actual conditions at the mine, as depicted on the mining plan map submitted May 4, 1984. Stipulation No. 11: A. The remainder of the main haul/access road not shown on the permit map was submitted on November 27, 1984, and a copy is attached. All embanl®ent slope grade restrictions are in accord- ance with the regulations. Portions of the roadway exceeding cut slope grade restrictions in the regulations are shown on the P. 0. BOX 1038. JANESVILLE. WISCONSIN 53545