GENERAL47107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Given the factors involved, the Division fmds it is appropriate to propose an irrigation water material damage suspect level of 1.5 mmhos/cm for Trout Creek, from the confluence of Middle Creek to the Yampa River. Establishing the suspect level at 1.5 mmhos/cm acknowledges the evidence submitted by the applicant while maintaining a reasonable suspect level established through reseazch and application. As a result of TR-32, the applicant has proposed a plan to dischazge mine water only when the stream has the dilution capacity to maintain waters at or below the discharge points on Fish Creek and Trout Creek to 1.5 mmhos/cm. In summary, projected flood irrigation water quality is 1.230 mmhos/cm and material damage in terms of productivity declines would not be expected unless water salinity were to exceed 1.5 mruhos/cm. Given the minor effect of mine dischazge on Trout Creek surface water quality, a specific projection of alluvia[ ground water impact was not made. Since alluvial rechazge would occur in late spring and early summer when dilution due to snowmelt runoff is at its peak, it follows that alluvial waters (and thus subirrigation) would be less affected by mine discharge than Trout Creek surface water (and flood irrigation}. 3. The proposed operation would preserve the essential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley floor. The essential hydrologic functions of the Trout Creek alluvial valley floor have been identified as the capacity to support subirrigated and flood irrigated agricultural activities. The proposed plan would not result in any surface disturbance or undermining of the AVF. Also, as discussed previously, no material damage would result from changes in the quality of surface and ground water that supply the alluvial valley floor. Thus, the essential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley floor would not be affected by the proposed operation. Foidel Creek/Middle Creek Confluence Area Map 15 of the life of mine application delineates previously designated alluvial valley floors in the vicinity of the Foidel Creek/Middle Creek confluence, downstream along Middle Creek to the Trout Creek confluence and downstream on Trout Creek to the Yampa River. Map 15 shows a flood irrigated field at the confluence of Foidel and Middle Creek and a number of flood irrigated fields along the Trout Creek AVF downstream from the Middle Creek confluence. In the 1983 Findings for the Foidel Creek Mine, the Division concluded that lower Foidel Creek, lower Middle Creek and lower Trout Creek were alluvial valley floors because of a presumed capability to support flood irrigated and subirrigated agricultural activities. The Trout Creek AVF was addressed previously in this section. Subirrigated alluvium on Middle Creek downstream of Routt County Road No. 27 crossing does not meet AVF criteria due to limited farmable acreage, as was also discussed previously. The alluvial body at the confluence of Foidel Creek and Middle Creek extending from the County Road No. 33 crossing of Middle Creek upstream on Middle to the first Trout Creek irrigation diversion as depicted on Map No. 15, Water Rights and Alluvial Valley Floors, does meet alluvial valley floor criteria based upon existing flood irrigation and a presumed capability to support subirrigated vegetation. These findings do not address azeas further upstream on Middle Creek, as they aze not hydrologically connected to the proposed mining operation. The required findings for the identified alluvial valley floor at the confluence of Foidel Creek and Middle Creek are set forth below. 32