Laserfiche WebLink
1. The permit area of the proposed operation in not within: <br />a. an area designated unsuitable for mining; <br />b. an area under study for designation as unsuitable for surface coal <br />mining; <br />c. on any lands subject to prohibitions or limitations; and <br />d. 300 feet from any occupied dwelling. <br />XXVII. Demonstration that Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operati <br />The Division finds, based on information in the application that surface coal <br />mining and reclamation can be feasibly accomplished under the mining and <br />reclamation plan contained in the application (2.07.6(2)(b)). <br />XXVIII. Compatibility with Anticipated Adjacent Operations - <br />The Division finds that Seneca II Mine operation will not be inconsistent with <br />other operations anticipated to be performed in areas adjacent to the proposed <br />permit area (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />XXIX. Reclamation Fees Re wired by 30CFR, Cha ter VII, Sub-cha ter R - Rule <br />o . <br />Based on contact with the OSMRE Kansas City Field Office on September 11, <br />1986, the Division finds that all reclamation fees required by 30 CFR Chapter <br />VII, Sub-chapter R have been paid. <br />The Division finds Peabody Coal Company in compliance with this requirement <br />(2.07.6(2)(0). <br />/vj r <br />4792E <br />-44- <br />