My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47060
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:06:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/17/1994
Doc Name
CRESSON PROJECT PN M-80-244 PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL LARGE SCALE INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS RESULTS INCORP
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING CO
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i <br />Sliding during the shearing was observed between the liner cover fill and geomembrane in all 01 <br />the normal stress ranges with the exception of the 50 psi normal stress using 30 percent of the <br />Goldstar tails. This is consistent with previous test results and indicates that use of the tailings <br />as a thin smoothing layer does not significantly reduce the frictional strength of the soil liner <br />fill/geomembrane interface. Results of the large scale direct shear tests are presented in draft form <br />as Attachment A. The pending results will be forwarded to MLRD in draft form as soon as they <br />are completed. A copy of the final report will also be forwarded to MLRD once it has been <br />completed by GeoSyntec. <br />The previous slope stability analyses were evaluated using engineering strength parameters of 24° <br />for the angle of internal friction and 100 psf for the cohesion intercept. The critical failure surface <br />was a wedge type failure that occurred along the geotexiile/geomembrane interface. The critical <br />failure surface did not occur along the composite liner section. The results of the previous slope <br />stability analyses are presented in the Responses to Comments by Technical Reviewer, D. P. <br />Engineering, lnc., March 1994. <br />Since the input parameters that were used in the referenced work are still valid and the theoretical <br />critical failure surface did not occur through the composite liner, additional stability analyses are <br />not required. <br />If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact either me or Dr. Van Zyl. <br />Respectfully, <br />GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. <br />~~q.~~ <br />David A. Kidd, P.F. <br />Project Manager <br />Geotechnical Engineering <br />Attachment A: Draft Test Results <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.