My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46907
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:59:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/19/1985
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mid-Term Apex No. 2 Mine -2- November 19, 1985 <br />A re-evaluation of this issue revealed that the springs are low <br />flowing with a probable source being perched aquifers. The springs <br />are non-adjudicated and are three quarters of a mile away from the <br />mine permit boundary. In doing the probable hydrologic <br />consequences assessment contained in our Apex Findings Document, it <br />was clear that MLRD assumed worst case in the assessment. It is <br />stated that even if the springs go dry, the resultant reduction in <br />stream flow would not be significant. Under these circumstances <br />MLRD sees no reason to require monitoring of these springs. <br />If in the future an extension of the mine workings to the northwest <br />is requested or, if significant mine inflows are encountered, MLRD <br />may require monitoring of the springs at that time. <br />B. The annual mine inflow study and sump water analysis should be <br />continued by the operator. The Division recommends that Apex <br />delete the following parameters from the sump analysis: <br />Dissolved Oxygen <br />Phosphate <br />Aluminum <br />Selenium <br />These parameters have consistently been below EPA water quality <br />criteria and Colorado Receiving Stream Standards for Trout Creek. <br />The Division requests Apex add total alkalinity and silver to the <br />sump monitoring list. Alkalinity is a measure of the buffering <br />capacity of the water. An elevated level of alkalinity is <br />beneficial since it may complex with metals and remove them from <br />solution. We request silver be added since it is a receiving <br />stream standard and has recently been identified at elevated levels <br />at other mines in the Twentymile Park Basin. If it is undetected <br />in the sump water it can be deleted in the future. <br />C. A review of the monitoring data on alluvial and stream quality <br />was conducted by MLRD for data collected from 1980-1985. The data <br />does not show any significant trends or adverse impacts that could <br />be related to the Apex Mine. The alluvial well does show some <br />anomalous levels of zinc, mercury, cadmium, and aluminum (at or <br />slightly below standards), however, the levels are not <br />significantly above standards, nor are they consistent. Due to the <br />lower levels encountered and the dilution effects of the stream, <br />MLRD recommends that laboratory analysis of both the stream and <br />alluvial well be suspended. Sufficient data exists to correlate <br />field pH and conductivity to any effects caused by major ions or <br />metals leached from the mine. Since the operation has been <br />essentially unchanged for five years, any effects from the mine <br />should have been identified by now. If discharges from the mine <br />occur in the future the laboratory analysis should be continued. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.