Laserfiche WebLink
6. For this operation, private mineral estate has not been severed from <br />private surface estate, therefore, the documentation specified by Rule <br />2.03.6(2) is not required. (2.07.6 (2)(f)). <br />7. On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from <br />other state and federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) <br />compliance review required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining <br />Reclamation Act, the Division finds that Terror Creek Company does not <br />own or control any operations which are currently in violation of any <br />law, rule, or regulation of the United States, or any State law, rule, or <br />regulation, or aqy provision of the Surface Mining Control and <br />Reclamation Act or the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act. <br />(2.07.6 (2) (g) (i )) . <br />8. Terror Creek Campar~y does not control and has not controlled mining <br />operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act <br />of such nature, duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to <br />the environment as to indicate an intent not to comp]y with the <br />provisions of the Act. (2.07.6(2)(h)). <br />9. The Division finds that surface coal mining and reclamation operations to <br />be performed under this permit will not be inconsistent with other such <br />operations anticipated to be performed in areas adjacent to the permit <br />area. (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />10. The Division has examined the existing corporate surety bond in the <br />amount of E96,550.95. This bond has received final approval. The above <br />bond amount reflects the Division's projection of reclamation costs for <br />worst-case disturbance which will occur during the proposed permit term. <br />(2.07.6.(2)(j)). <br />11. The Division has made a negative determination for the presence of prime <br />farm land within the permit area. The decision was based on mapping and <br />conversations with personnel at the U.S. Soil Conservation Service that <br />demonstrates that no prime farmland mapping units are found within the <br />permit area. See page 2.04-18, Map 3, and Exhibit 6 of the permit <br />application. (2.07.6 (2) (k) ). <br />12. Based on information provided in the application the Division has <br />determined that an alluvial valley floor exists within the permit or <br />affected area. The alluvial valley floor is known as the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River. (2.07.6 (2)(K) and 2.06.8(3)(C)). <br />For additional specific findings concerning this alluvial valley floor, <br />please see Section B, YI. <br />13. The Division hereby approves the post-mining land use of the operation. <br />It was determined that cropland (irrigated hdy) meets the requirements of <br />Rule 4.16 for the permit area. Aland use map is provided as Map No. 4 <br />of the permit application. Pre~nining land uses are discussed on pages <br />2.04-2 through 2.04-4. Post-mining land use is discussed on page 2.05-10 <br />and 2.05-15 of the application. (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />-15- <br />