Laserfiche WebLink
Rule 2.05.6 (6) <br />(1) Please update PAP Volume 11A by consolidating all the information contained therein dating from <br />the Apache Rocks ("themtal event") drilling to the current degas drilling activity into a single, <br />coherent description. Maps should be consolidated also, in a manner to be decided by discussion <br />between MCC and Division personnel. From this point on, new activity should be documented by <br />revision of this volume and its maps, rather than by simple addition of new material. <br />An important feature of the update should be a table showing the drillholes and their status. This <br />table would be updated with each revision that changed the status of the drillholes and sites. The <br />table (or a sepazate one) should also specify the drillpad and its size and the road lengths that have <br />been added. These all would be updated as their status changed from active to reclaimed. <br />(2) Please update the discussion of subsidence found on pages 2.05-152, 153, and within that section of <br />the permit, based on observations from B-seam mining. This entire section should be updated to <br />reflect several years of subsidence monitoring. (For example, annual subsidence reports document <br />swface cracks above panels 12, 13, 13A, 14, and I5, with depths of cover of 1150 to 1350 feet for <br />panels 13 and 13A, and approximately 1500 feet for panel 14. That section of the pemtit states that <br />swface cracking is not observed when cover is greater than 600 feet. Also, a landslide is attributed <br />to subsidence on p. 9 of the December 2002 subsidence report.) <br />The Division anticipates a coherent and informative discussion on subsidence impacts that <br />incorporates the observations of ten yeazs of monitoring since the inception of the monitoring <br />program above longwall mining, including observations on streams, and the coincidence of various <br />subsidence features with the underlying operational azeas of the mine. <br />(3) Exhibit 55 (Stream Channel Parameters and Changes Due to Mining Induced Subsidence) contains <br />predictions of the effects of subsidence on stream channels. Within the analysis, some of the basins <br />aze evaluated based on the subsidence effects of 2-seam mining, notably on page 7 of that document <br />and the succeeding tables. Because of the importance of subsidence on the Dry Fork of Minnesota <br />Creek and its tributaries, a revised analysis should be provided to account for the current plan for <br />mining the azea within the watersheds in the "south of divide" azea since two-seam mining is no <br />longer planned. <br />4.07.3 <br />The Division has developed a recommended procedure for permanent sealing of methane degas <br />drillholes. It is requested that Mountain Coal Company adopt the procedwes therein for use when <br />abandoning degas wells and that this procedwe be included within the 2004 annual operating plan <br />for the degas program. <br />SECTION V -RECLAMATION LIABILITY <br />Pwsuant to Rule 3.02.2(4) the Division conducted a complete review of the reclamation liability for <br />the West Ells Mine w February 2004, as part of the midterm review. Currently the Division holds a <br />bond for $10,000,000 for the West Elk Mine. The estimate for the mine, updated for current costs, is <br />$11, 085, 357. This represents an increase of $1,085,357.00, <br />Mountain Coal Company must submit the additional bond to the Division within 60 days of the <br />receipt of this letter. <br />17 <br />