My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46097
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:17:06 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/6/2002
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN4
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VIII. Backfilling and Grading <br />Details of the backfilling and grading plan at the Seneca II Mine aze found in Volume 10, <br />Tab 12 and Volume 12, Tab 13 of the permit application. A backfilling and grading <br />timetable is presented on Exhibit 13-2, and in the permit application. <br />All azeas affected by surface coal mining operations, except specifically exempted by the <br />Division, will be returned to approximate original contour as shown on Exhibit 12-9. <br />This includes the drainage channels which aze returned to approximate original locations <br />to help maintain appropriate downstream water rights. The spoil is cast by the dragline <br />into the adjacent open pit and compacted by the reclamation equipment. All spoils will <br />be graded, highwalls reduced and spoil piles and depressions eliminated except those <br />depressions that existed prior to mining. Cut and fill terraces aze not proposed at the <br />Seneca II Mine. <br />The following fmdings were made regazding backfilling and grading practices at the <br />mine: <br />The applicant requested additional time for backfilling and grading following coal <br />removal in an azea strip mine. A detailed written analysis under 2.05.4(2)(c) <br />demonstrated that additional time is necessary based on coal production rates. <br />Therefore, the Division approved the additional time for the Wolf Creek and Wadge <br />pit areas, and the non-coal waste disposal site. The Wolf Creek and Wadge pit azeas <br />were reclaimed within 180 days of initial disturbance, but were regraded within 4 <br />spoil ridges of the active pit. This delay was necessary because of production rates <br />and pit sequencing. In some cases, it took four spoil rows to create sufficient spoil <br />azea to allow final grading to "daylight' and bland-into Ute surrounding topography. <br />All highwalls have been regraded at the Seneca II Mine site. <br />The Division approved backfilling, grading and fmal reclamation of Auger Area E to <br />be completed in 1998. The solid waste disposal site, a previously mined wadge azea <br />pit is still being utilized and has not been reclaimed at this time. Deadlines for <br />backfilling and grading of these azeas are presented on Exhibit 13-2. (4.14.1) <br />2. The Division has approved the retention of box cut spoil or initial cut spoil outside <br />the pit area since the applicant has demonstrated that such material is not required to <br />achieve approximate original contour in accordance with 4.09.1. Excess spoil was <br />generated in the Wolf Creek Area, and was placed in a fill adjacent to the initial box <br />cut. Information concerning the fill is located in Tab 12 of the permit application. <br />Small depressions in the backfill will be used to minimize erosion, create or enhance <br />wildlife habitat, conserve soil moisture, and promote revegetation. Seneca Coal <br />Company has included in the postmine grading operation the use of very small <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.