Laserfiche WebLink
Vegetation in the area grows largel}• in response to mat:ro climatic influences <br />of the region. The north-facing slopes, having moderate to deep soils, a <br />• relatively mesic moisture regime, and favorable levels of insolation <br />throughout the }•ear, are characterized by well-developed mountain shrub <br />communities. On the colluvial toeslopes, communities dominated by sagebrush <br />and some grasses occur. Or. the south-facing slopes behind the ridgeline of <br />[he Williams Fork mountains, vegetative communities are• not as well-developed <br />in terms of cover, density, and production due to the less favorable soils, <br />moisture regime, and increased insolation. The trend i.n these areas is toward <br />communities dominated by juniper, pinyon, mountain mahogany, and xerophytes. <br />Sdithin the permit area, natural vegetative communities have been modified to <br />varying extents by man and domestic animals. PSuch of t:he toeslope has been <br />cleared of native vegetation and is currently utilized for dryland <br />agriculture. P1ost of the north-facing slopes in the area have been utilized <br />for the grazing of sheep and cattle. Due to the above„ the permit area is <br />characterized by mosaic distributions of communities. <br />In transversing the permit area from east to west, the mountain shrub <br />community begins to thin (in terms of density and cover) until it is replaced <br />on the far west by a community of big sagebrush and grasses. As one descends <br />from the ridge of the Williams Fork mountains (proceed::ng northward), several <br />changes in community composition are noted. At elevations above 7,200 feet, <br />the mountain shrub community is characterized by Gambe:i's oak, which is <br />dominant over serviceberry and chokecherry. Snowberrg is the most conspicuous <br />understor}• component, with an occasional big sagebrush., rubber rabbitbrush, or <br />bitterbrush. S•Iith a decrease in elevation comes a corresponding decrease in <br />oak dominance. Sagebrush, serviceberry, and chokecherry are interspersed, <br />while oak dominates only on west-facing slopes. Entering the lowest <br />• elevations, the serviceberry/chokecherry component diminishes, leaving a <br />communi[}• dominated by sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and grasses. <br />Land Use <br />Lands within [he proposed permit area have exhibited three major historic land <br />uses: rangeland (grazing of sheep and cattle), cropland (cultivation of <br />dryland crops, predominantly wheat), and wildlife habir_at. Rangeland and <br />wildlife habitat comprise approximately 24 percent and 60 percent respectively <br />of the proposed permit area and are located on slopes :ind toeslopes on the <br />north face of the Williams Fork mountains. Cropland located predominantly on <br />the flatter areas north of the toeslopes and in areas surrounding the <br />north-draining gulches of the area, comprises approximately 16 percent of the <br />proposed permit area. <br />-3- <br />• <br />