My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL45457
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL45457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:14:48 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:51:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/12/1994
Doc Name
PROPOSED MINE EXPANSION PLANS AT THE EAGLE MINES C-81-044
From
DMG
To
CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiim m <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 21 S <br />Denver, Colorario 80207 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 A32-R106 <br />July 12, 1994 <br />Mr. Marcus Middleton <br />Cyprus Empire Corporation <br />P.O. Box 68 <br />Craig, CO 81626 <br />RE: Proposed Mine Expansion Plans at the Eagle Mines <br />Dear Mr. Middleton: <br />~~j2 <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OI I <br />NATURAI . <br />RESOURCE`.- <br />Rny Romer <br />covcrnoi <br />lames 5 LochheaA <br />E.eC Wive Director <br />M¢hael B. Long <br />Division Dneao~ <br />(C-81-044) <br />When we recently discussed Cyprus Empire's plans for possible <br />expansion of the Eagle Mine, I told you our staff would offer some <br />guidance as to what facets of baseline data collection would be <br />necessary prior to submittal of permit revisions. Here is a <br />summary of my thoughts, along with the enclosed memo by Barbara <br />Pavlik which discusses hydrology matters. <br />You proposed a scenario in which CEC would submit a series of three <br />technical revisions. The first two revisions would address <br />extension of main entries and development of a z•ock tunnel up to <br />the H seam. A third revision would permit three new longwall <br />panels and addition of associated acreage to the :permit area. The <br />development work could be permitted by one or two technical <br />revisions. However, permitting the new longwall panels would <br />appear to entail addition of 1200-1500 acres to the permit area and <br />mining of a new coal seam in a previously unmined area. This is a <br />significant alteration of the current permit which should be done <br />by means of a permit revision. <br />As I mentioned earlier, it appears that the time :Frames associated <br />with review of two TR's and a PR would not interfere with the <br />projected time frames CEC is considering. The most critical <br />consideration in regard to time, is the adequate collection of <br />required baseline data. Please refer to Barbara's enclosed memo <br />for a general outline of the hydrology baseline topics which should <br />be addressed. CEC will need to collect data over a one year period <br />adequate to characterize the aquifers, streams, and springs <br />mentioned in the memo prior to developing the longwall panels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.