Laserfiche WebLink
APT Project CMX2453 <br />Test Report, Kiln Stack Emissions (March 24, 2003) <br />Each sampling period cdnsisted of extracting a gas sample from the stack under isokinetic <br />flow conditions fora 192-minute period. The gas passed through an in-stack glass nozzle, <br />a heated glass probe, aloes-residue, heated, quartz fiber filter, a series of six (6) chilled <br />glass impingers, and a calibrated dry gas meter. Stack gas velocity and volumetric flow <br />rate sampling consisted of conducting a temperature and differential pressure traverse of <br />the stack along the PM/Metals grid of sampling points using a K-type thermocouple and an <br />S-type pitot tube. A dry, integrated sample of stack gas was collected in a Tedlar bag. <br />At the start of sampling, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of 10% hydrogen <br />peroxide/5% nitrc acid. The third impinger was empty. The fourth and fifth impingers <br />contained 100 ml of 4% potassium permanganate/10% sulfuric acid. The sixth impinger <br />contained approximately 250 grams of dried silica gel. <br />Following each sampling period, the filter, a series of acetone and dilute nitric acid rinses of <br />the probe and nozzle, and the contents of the impingers were recovered for subsequent <br />gravimetric and ICPMS analysis. The front half and back half sample fractions were <br />combined priortomultl-metals analysis. The contents of the 7edlar bag were analyzed for <br />carbon dioxide and oxygen content using an Orsat apparatus. The laboratory data were <br />combined with field data to calculate the PM and metals (on an elemental basis) emissions <br />in units of milligrams per dry standard cubic meter corrected to 7% oxygen (mgldscm @ <br />7% 02 -for multi-metals only), pounds per hour (Ib/hr), and pounds per ton of dry feed to <br />the kiln (for PM only). <br />5.1.1. Supplemental QA/QC Procedures - PM and Metals <br />As required by the method, a sample of unexposed impinger solutions and a set of three <br />fitters were analyzed along with the emission samples. Additionally, a field blank was <br />acquired during the test program. The blank train was assembled at the sampling location, <br />leak checked three times, and recovered. The recoveries were analyzed like a regulatory <br />sample to quantify background concentrations. <br />5.2. PCDDs/PCDFs. PCBs and PAHs <br />PCDD/PCDF, PCB and PAH emissions were determined in accordance with EPA Method <br />23, 428 and 429. The methods were combined in a single sampling train. <br />Each sampling period consisted of extracting a gas sample from the stack under isokinetic <br />flow conditions fora 192-minute period. The gas passed through an in-stack.giass nozzle, <br />a heated glass probe, a heated quartz fiber filter, a chilled glass condenser, a sorbent trap, <br />a series of four (4) chilled glass impingers to remove residual water, and a calibrated dry <br />gas meter. Stack gas velocity and volumetric flow rate sampling consisted of conducting a <br />temperature and differential pressure traverse of the stack along a grid of sampling points <br />page 15 <br />