Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />i • <br />Item #2 The State had already agreed to the claim for 5180.00. <br />Item #3 I find in favor of the Contractor for 5180.00. <br />Item #4 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #5 I find in favor of the Contractor for 5942.00. <br />Item #6 I find iri favor of the Contractor for 5580.00. <br />Item #7 No payment is due on this claim. This is a punch list item. <br />Item #8 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #9 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #10 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #11 I find in favor of the Contractor for 52,400. <br />Item #12 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #13 No payment is due on this claim. <br />Item #14 No payment is due on this claim. <br />C. Owner Claims <br />Item #1 I agree with the previous decision to drop this issue. <br />Item #2 The contractor needs to complete this work to the satisfaction of the <br />State or the State should take over the work and deduct it from the <br />retainage. <br />Item #3. The State has a legitimate claim in the amount of 57,623.00 <br />Item #4. Liquidated damages are due in the amount of 51,800.00 <br />Please see the attached Financial Summary dated May 19, 1995. <br />~----,. <br />Sincere~4y <br />~~ <br />Dennis Larsen <br />c: Nanci Kadlecek <br />Andre' Pettigrew <br />Diana Mattox <br />Maggie Van Cleef <br />Ric Conard <br />