My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44870
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44870
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:34 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:23:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/22/1995
Doc Name
FINAL DECISION ON CWL CLAIM PO C-79064
From
DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION
To
COLORADO WEST LEASING
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_~ <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III y <br />999 <br />>J 1111 <br />CAPITOL COMPLEX FACILITIES <br />Dcpartmcnl of Administration <br />1341 Sherman Strca <br />Dcnvcr, CO 80203 <br />Phonc (303) 866-4357 (VOICE & T. D. D. ) <br />FAX (303) 866-43117 <br />Nrdre Peuigrcw <br />Fxecuwe Director <br />May 22, 1995 <br />Mr. Preston Meese <br />Colorado West Leasing <br />241 31 3/10 Road <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81503 <br />RE: Final Decision on CWL Claim / PO #C-79064 <br />Dear Mr. Meese <br />~~O <br />pF' COQ <br />~P' O <br />~* <br />•~ 18]6 ~ <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Diana Mauox <br />Director <br />Please find attached my report relative to the final decision involving the subject <br />Claim against the Division of Minerals and Geology. This decision was arrived at <br />after an initial review dated March 15, 1995, a hearing conducted on March 24, <br />1 995, and a site visit on April 27, 1995. All of these events contributed to the <br />ultimate outcome of this final decision. <br />The following is a summary of my findings: <br />A. Negligence Claims <br />Item #1 There is no evidence of negligence. _ <br />Item #2 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #3 The State was negligence <br />Item #4 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #5 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #6 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #7 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #8 There is no evidence of negligence <br />Item #9 The State is negligent in not pursuing the change order process. <br />B. Claims of Monetary Entitlement <br />Item #1 The State currently has in retainage the amount of 525,695.00 with <br />the balance of this claim having been overpaid to the contractor by <br />5326.99. <br />Partners Providing Quality Service for Better Government <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.