My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44590
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:19 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/16/2007
Doc Name
2006 Revegetation Evaluation
From
J.E. Stover & Associates Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Given the relatively young age of monitored revegetation (4 years more or less), revegetated <br />community maturation is progressing reasonably well in many locations (see Table 1). In those locations <br />indicated as progressing reasonably well (given comparison with success criteria), another evaluation at <br />year 6 is strongly recommended. For those locations indicating more marginal progress with regard to <br />diversity or cover attainment, it would be prudent to "subsidize" those locations with standard husbandry <br />practices as allowed under 4.15.7 (5) before monitoring again at year 6. Recommendations for standard <br />husbandry practices include treating those areas with more than 15% ground cover by annual grasses <br />with a specific herbicide such as Plateau or Oust for a minimum of one season, but more appropriately <br />for two to three concurrent seasons. These treatment areas along with those locations that seem to be <br />missing the forb or warm-season grass component should also be interseeded with appropriate taxa to <br />supplement the seed base that may now be depleted. One or two locations should also receive <br />supplemental cool-season grass taxa. Two additional sites (Roadside RBA and the Diversion Ditch) <br />exhibit subset areas with elevated cheatgrass levels and reduced desirable species. These areas should <br />be specific targets for "husbandry" efforts. In all cases, plans for such efforts should be cleared with <br />CDRMS before implementation to insure that the reclamation clock is not reset unnecessarily. <br />As indicated in Cedar Creek's 2004 report, application of herbicide must coincide with the initial <br />"green-up" of cheatgrass in early spring prior to any other species breaking dormancy. The interseeding <br />should be heavily weighted toward warm-season grasses and perennial fortis /sub-shrubs, which are <br />presently in low abundance throughout much of the revegetation. The interseeding should occur by <br />pedestrian means using belt mounted /hand operated seed distributors ("whirlygigs'~. Mechanical <br />measures will disturb the soil surface thereby further encouraging cheatgrass emergence. A <br />recommended mix for this interseeding effort would be as follows: <br />Species Lbs acre Seeds / ftz <br />Warm-season Grasses <br />Galleta Pleuraphisjamesii 2.0 7.30 <br />Curly Mesquite Hi/aria be/anger 1.0 6.20 <br />Cool-season Grasses <br />Crested wheatgrass Agropyron aistatum 1.0 4.59 <br />Thickspike wheatgrass E/ymus/anceo/alusssp. 1. 2.0 7.07 <br />Russian Wildrye Psathyrostachysjunceus 1.0 4.02 <br />Perennial Fortis & Subshrubs <br />Palmer penstemon Penstemon pa/meri 0.5 7.00 <br />Prostrate kochia Kodria prosbata 1.0 9.36 <br />Gardner Saltbush Abiplexgardneri 1.0 2.56 <br />Winterfat K2scheninnikovia/anata 2.0 2.60 <br /> TOTAL 11.5 50.70 <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 22 sNOWCAP COAL COMPANY <br />Revegetatlon Evaluation - 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.