My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44240
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/12/1986
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-16- <br />Alluvial Yallev Floors - Findings <br />The applicant is eligible for exemption from the requirements of Section <br />34-33-114(2)(e)(II) of C.R.S. 1973 by virtue of having a permit issued prior <br />to August 3, 1977. This permit was a License to Mine, issued by the Colorado <br />Division of Mines on December 14, 1976. This was the only primary permit <br />required at the time by Colorado law to operate an underground coal mine. The <br />areal extent of this exemption must be based upon a demonstration of financial <br />or regulatory commitment to mine prior to August 3, 1977. In this case, mine <br />maps submitted to the Division of Mines and information in the permit <br />application (see "Ground Water Investigation of Steven Gulch" in Volume 4) <br />provide the appropriate financial or regulatory demonstration. Therefore, <br />both areas identified as alluvial valley floors in Steven's Gulch and along <br />the North Fork of the Gunnison River are exempt from the requirements of <br />Section 34-33-114(2)(e)(I). The permit revision area and the potential <br />alluvial valley floor in adjacent Terror Creek is not covered by the <br />grandfather provision, and will be discussed separately later. <br />Although exempted from Section 34-33-114(2)(e)(I), the applicant must still <br />comply with Section 34-33-120(2 )(j)(VI) for all activities which involve <br />surface operations or surface impacts incident to the underground portions of <br />the mine. To demonstrate compliance, the applicant must identify the <br />essential hydrologic functions of an alluvial valley floor and submit a plan <br />demonstrating that the essential hydrologic functions can be preserved <br />throughout mining or restored after mining. <br />The essential hydrologic functions of the AYF along the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison are both flood irrigation and subirrigation. The lower levels of <br />this AVF are subirrigated naturally. However, the upper portions which <br />exhibit some subirrigation may be attributed to recharge from adjacent <br />irrigation ditches and canals. In these areas flood irrigation is the <br />essential function. <br />The operator will restore the essential hydrologic functions of this alluvial <br />valley floor at the completion of mining. The loadout facilities will be <br />dismantled and hauled off the site. The area will be regraded to restore <br />irrigation ditches and original pre-mining contours. To verify that the site <br />has been restored to its pre-mining function of flood irrigable lands, the <br />Division is imposing the following monitoring stipulation: <br />Stipulation No. 3 <br />ONE YEAR AFTER THE COMPLETION OF RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES AT THE LOADOUT <br />THE OPERATOR SHALL COMPARE THE SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RECLAIMED <br />AREA WITH THE ADJACENT UNDISTURBED ORCHARD AREAS TO VERIFY THAT THE <br />HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION OF FLOOD IRRIGABILITY HAS BEEN RESTORED. SUCH <br />COMPARISON SHOULD BE IN THE FORM OF INFILTRATION, PERMEABILITY AND <br />TEXTURE STUDIES. <br />..,~ r...a._ .,.....~.. __ . .. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.