My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44142
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:12:58 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/23/1995
From
COLO WEST LEASING
To
CAPITOL COMPLEX FACILITIES
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /># 13 <br /> <br />The states claims are false. They are holding this money as <br />a coercive action to make me settle. Plus some of the <br />justified bills that should have been paid date clear back <br />to March. Sandra Browns decision should have paid interest <br />on the items found in CWLs favor, but it didn't. <br /># 14 <br />This road was built under equipment rental time to their <br />specifications. Rains washed silt from the long freshly <br />tiled slope above it, and filled it with sediment. The rain <br />then crossed the road and carried sediment into Energy Fuels <br />permitted area. Energy Fuels representatives ask DMG to <br />correct this. DMG had us do this work. It was not CWLs <br />responsibility to correct this, but the states. We demand <br />to be paid for this work. I would also wager that it is <br />full again and running onto Energy Fuels permitted mine. <br />States Claims <br /># 2 <br />I guess the only way to resolve this is for you and I to go <br />dig it up. I will provide the laborers and the shovels, and <br />do this at your convenience. <br /># 3 <br />You state that DMG has evidence that the topsoil was lost. <br />I would like to have them produce this evidence today. Also <br />see the Coyly Company letter dated November 18, second <br />paragraph. The reason Nelson wasn't concerned was because <br />we were doing this work in accordance with_the contract. <br />Mr. Coyly was upset because the DMG hold mine operators to a <br />different standard than the DMG does their own reclamation. <br />The grading work in this area was done on the first of <br />March. DMG did not assert claims for lost of growth median <br />until May 10th. They never did hold progress payment on <br />this work. It became a coercive action on DMGs part when <br />CWL refused to remove other topsoil piles that were not <br />identified in the contract under lump sum topsoiling prices. <br />It is still unclear if this area was part of the original <br />bid. It appears to be negotiated work to me. And in the <br />negotiations there was nothing was said about salvaging <br />topsoil. Dave Bucknam was the one doing this negotiation. <br /># 4 <br />John Nelson told CWL numerous times that time would be <br />allowed for revegitation. Earlier in this letter I stated <br />the facts about seed delivery and the backing off of the <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.