GENERAL43949

• Permit No: C1981034
• IBM Index Class Name: General Documents
• Doc Date: 1/26/1996
• Doc Name: Midterm Review Findings Document
• Permit Index Doc Type: Findings
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

collection procedure and should reference the sample location map
and the soil analysis report.
2.05.4(21
6. Much of the reclamation plan narrative beginning on Page 126
was written prospectively, prior to 1988 when a major portion of
the reclamation was conducted, and is therefore outdated. It is
recommended that the reclamation plan be updated by inclusion of a
summary description of the reclamation which has been performed to
date, and the remaining reclamation tasks to be performed, along
with an updated schedule for completion of the remaining tasks.
7. Page 130 (revised 6/7/93) contains an updated reclamation
narrative, and refers to sub-areas as delineated in Table
2.05.4(2)(b)(3) (revised 3/3/89). Sub-area designations on Page
130 do not correspond to the sub-area designations used in the
table. Area #6 describes the powder magazine road (#3 in the
table), Area #7 applies to the remaining portion of the access road
(#6 in the table), and Area #8 applies to the sediment pond and
lower segment of the permanent channel (#7 in the table). Area 8
in the table (drill hole reclamation) is not addressed in the
narrative on Page 130, nor elsewhere in the reclamation plan.
Page 130 should be revised to correspond to the sub-areas as
designated on Table 2.05.4(2)(b)(3), and a plan describing the
method of reclaiming each exploration hole, other bore hole, or
well as required by Rule 2.05.4(2)(g), and 4.07.3(1), and (2), as
applicable, should be included.
8. Discussion of sediment pond reclamation on Page 130 states
that the major drainage channel will be relocated so that it runs
through the bottom of the draw after the pond is removed. The text
should clarify that the culvert which currently passes disturbed
drainage beneath the major drainage channel a short distance above
the pond would be removed, along with the associated collection
ditch, and that the channel segment which currently bypasses the
sediment pond would be reclaimed. Also, the plan should clarify
whether existing berms, which prevent overland flow from entering
the main drainage channel will be removed.
9. Updated versions of Map 2.05.3(4)-2(a) "Post Reclamation
Drainage System Map", Map 2.05.4(2)(c)-2 "Final Contour Map with
Soil Sample and Cross Section Locations" should be prepared to
depict the final drainage system and topography following final
reclamation of the pond, collection and diversion ditches, and road
segment adjacent to the pond. An additional east-west cross
section through the reclaimed sediment pond and road segment should
also be provided, as well as a longitudinal profile of the segment
of the main drainage segment to be relocated.
10. Beca}ise all required revegetation other than that associated
10