Laserfiche WebLink
complying with prepetition consent order to remediate wetlands <br />violations with respect to property not owned by debtor). <br />The Colorado Division of NIinerals and Geology's remedy of <br />requiring the Debtor Powderhorn to comply with its <br />reclamation and environmental remediation obligation is not a <br />dischargeable claim in bankruptcy, because the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology has not expended any public monies for <br />reclamation and environmental remediation. See, In re Torwico <br />Electronics, Inc., 8 F.3d 146, 150-51 (3d Cir. 1993), cert. <br />denied, 119 S.Ct. 1576 (1999); United States v. Union Scra <br />Iron & Metal, 123 B.R. 831, 836 (D.Minn.1990). <br />If the Lenders' Motion for Adequate Protection And Relief <br />From Stay is granted, there will be no more significant assets <br />in the estate of the Debtor Powderhorn with which to conduct <br />reclamation and environmental remediation in Colorado. The <br />Debtor Powderhorn operates only in the State of Colorado and <br />owns assets only in the State of Colorado. The only assets of <br />the Debtor Powderhorn are the Machinery and Equipment and the <br />Debtor Powderhorn's unreclaimed real estate. Until the <br />reclamation has been completed, the real estate is not salable <br />or has a greatly reduced value. Moreover, the value of the <br />real estate in a reclaimed state is unclear. It is also <br />18 <br />