Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Mr. Gregg Squire 3 December 17, 1986 <br />Colorado Mined Land Recl. Division <br />According to Soil Conservation Service recommendations for brush control, <br />shrubs should be thinned when canopy cover exceeds 10 to 15Y„ dependent upon <br />shrub species (USSC, Standards and Specifications Brush Management, 1984). <br />Further, when there is dual use as here, i.e. livestock grazing and wildlife <br />habitat, the SCS recommends managing [he brush in patterns that favor bush <br />livestock and wildlife (hence the 1.6 acre mature shrub clumps). <br />A mature stand of 1,000 shrub stems per acre will result in canopy cover Ear <br />in excess of 15%. Crown diameter (dependent upon the type of shrub) at matu- <br />rity will probably range from 3 to 12 Eeet (based on preliminary data at <br />Trapper Mine). If one conservatively assumes that in a mature stand of moun- <br />tain shrub the average shrub crown diameter is 5 Feet and the spacing of 1,000 <br />stems ('actual plants at maturity) per acre is 6.6 feet, then the canopy cover <br />is 45%.. (Canopy cover as determined from SCS Colorado Range Note ik27, 1987, <br />Proposed Method Eor Determining Percent Canopy Cover of Shrubs, Exhibit No. <br />3.) Table 2.3-13 of our permit application shows the premine shrub canopy <br />cover for undisturbed range sites A, B, and C within the mine plan area. <br />Range Site A had a premine shrub canopy cover of 64.5%: Range Site B 45.0%, <br />and Range Site C 35.9%. (See the permit application for method of measure- <br />ment.) So the 1000 stem standard would result in approximately the same <br />canopy cover as premine conditions. <br />But, the intent of the approved shrub reestablishment reclamation plan was to <br />end up with a shrub component [hat made optimum use of the reclaimed ran_ve- <br />lands Eor both livestock and wildlife. A standard of 1,000 stems per acre <br />will nut, in the lung term, achieve this goal. in fact, it has the potential <br />to recreate the brush thickets which existed prior to mining, which was agreed <br />during the application review to he a hindrance to optimum use by both live- <br />st~ck and big game. <br />This is supported by Vallentine (.1974) in a study un eastern Arizona pine <br />Forests. He found relative shrub-free areas (46 acres) are appropriate for <br />multiple-use (wildlife, domestic, live stuck, etc.) rangelands. In addltlun, <br />that study showed that deer preferred open areas high in furbs, while elk pre- <br />ferred open grassy areas with brush cover within 800 feet. <br />Thus, given the approved postmining land use uE domestic grazing and wildlife <br />habitat for A and B range sites, the present methods and approved densities <br />Eor shrub reestablishment in [he originally approved application remain appr~- <br />priate. Trapper is willing [o make that standard more explicit, as the Divi- <br />sion requested, by proposing to stale the standard as an overall average of <br />400 stems per acre. <br />TV VIIe "i. <br />What is the basis for the Div isiun cu impose a shrub standard different from <br />what was originally proposed and approved? <br />cunt. <br />