My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL43166
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL43166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:57 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:14:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/19/1996
Doc Name
BOND RELEASE VEGETATION SAMPLING Letter
From
DMG
To
TERRAMATRIX
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~II ~I~~I~~I~~~~~ ~I~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1 Jl l Sherman $~., Room 215 Ild` <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 II` <br />Phone: 13031 866-7567 <br />FAX: (7031832-BI06 <br />DEPARTMEM- OF <br />NATURAL <br />June 19, 1996 RES~iIRCES <br />ROy Romer <br />Governor <br />Mr. Michael R. Neumann Tames S. LOChhead <br />Executive Director <br />Senior Scientist <br />Michael 8. Long <br />TerraMatrix Division Dne<~or <br />P. O. Box 774018 <br />Steamboat Springs, Colorado 80477 <br />RE: Bond Release Vegetation Sampling, Hayden Gulch Mine, Permit <br />No. C-80-003, Hayden Gulch Coal Company <br />Dear Mr. Neumann: <br />On May 31, 1996, the Division received correspondence from Mr. Jim <br />orpet, dated May 29, 1996, concerning the vegetation sampling plan <br />for final bond release at the Hayden Gulch Mine. The Division <br />'appreciates the opportunity to review the proposed sampling plan <br />and has the following comments: <br />1. The sampling proposal does not give any details about how the <br />operator intends to stratify the samples in the areas that had <br />been reclaimed in nine different years. Please provide this <br />information. The Division suggests using the proportional <br />allocation or acreage-weighted methods as discussed in the <br />bond release guideline. Please comment. <br />2. The Division recommends that some representative data from <br />small, noncontiguous areas, such as topsoil stockpile C and <br />the explosives storage area, be included in the data <br />collection, even if randomly placed transects do not fall in <br />those areas. In this way, there would be documentation of the <br />success of the reclamation in those areas. If TerraMatrix <br />decides to not collect such data, a thorough discussion of <br />qualitative observations made of these areas should be <br />included in the study, at a minimum. Please comment. <br />3. The Division needs TerraMatrix to decide how to weigh the data <br />collected from the four reference areas in order to derive <br />success standards for cover and production. The Division <br />recommends the method discussed on page 10 of the 1988 <br />vegetation guidelines. Please comment. <br />TerraMatrix proposes to use the sample adequacy formula in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.