Laserfiche WebLink
Coal Methane Drainage Projeet - Pane/t 16-T4 Wert E/k Mine • Page 3-21 <br />Under Alternatives 2, 3, and 4, elk habitat effectiveness decreases from 45 percent to 33 percent <br />during the life of the project (7 years). This 12 percent decrease is attributed to the substantial <br />increase in traffic. MCC estimates 15 vehicle trips per day on roads needed in the project area. Post- <br />project elk habitat effectiveness returns to slightly better than pre-project levels. Under Altemative 2, <br />post-project elk habitat effectiveness is 46 percent. Because motorized road and trail densities in the <br />HABCAP model aze adjusted by established use type coefficients, there is little change between action <br />alternatives. All action alternatives propose similar total road use and frequency of vehicle trips (refer <br />to Table 2, Summary Comparison of Alternatives). Subsequently, post-project elk habitat <br />effectiveness increases slightly from the No-Action Alternative because the existing roads and trails <br />aze classi&ed as primitive (receiving an average of less than one vehicle per day). Therefore, post- <br />project obliteration of approximatelyl2 to 15 [rules of primitive roads (varies by alternative) increases <br />habitat effectiveness slightly from the existing condition. <br />Doting project implementation, elk habitat effectiveness will be lower than the Forest Plan objective <br />of 40 percent. Post-project and long-term elk habitat effectiveness will, however, increase thus <br />improving the areas effectiveness from existing condition. <br />All of the project area is within winter range as mapped by the CDOW. Standazd USFS stipulations <br />regarding timing restrictions for drilling and road construction will apply in this area. Human activity <br />associated with monitoring and maintenance of wells post-drilling was evaluated with local CDOW <br />representative, Kirk Madariaga (personal communication). CDOW indicated that operation and <br />maintenance of facilities utilizing as few personnel as possible and one access route at a time would <br />have minimal effects to wintering elk. Elk would continue to use the south and southwest facing <br />slopes where hiding cover is abundant. <br />An estimated 68 acres are proposed to be disturbed by road and drill pad construction under <br />Alternative 2, 63 acres under Alternative 3, 67 acres under Alternative 4, and 50 acres under <br />Alternative 5. Of the 54 proposed drill pads, 13 would be located in aspen, 5 in spruce-fu, and the <br />remaining 36 in oak habitat or on existing zoads/trails. Approximately 4.0 miles of road would be <br />located in aspen habitat and 0.4 miles in spruce-Fu habitat. Under Alternative 2, approximately 26.7 <br />acres of aspen and approximately 5 acres of spruce-fir habitat would be disturbed for project activities <br />(Cover Type Map and Overlay aze in the project file). <br />Of the total vegetated acres disturbed, 24 percent is aspen. Removal of aspen would likely be <br />permanent on these sites. Constmction and associated activities on drill pads and roads would cause <br />soil compaction, inhibiting regeneration of aspen sprouts. Openings caused by these disturbances <br />would be either too small or narrow to allow adequate sunlight to regenerate aspen. In addition, <br />because these sites would be small, any aspen regeneration would likely be very attractive to elk, deer, <br />and/or livestock. Repeated browsing would eventually kill the aspen sprouts. <br />Displacement of songbirds and small mammals is also expected in road and drill pad construction <br />areas. In general, most wildlife would avoid these areas until reclaimed, since the proposed activities <br />would eliminate all vegetation from the disturbance areas. The effects of methane gas emissions on <br />songbirds is not fully understood. Methane gas has a density of approximately 50 percent that of air, <br />therefore, it will rise and mix in the atmosphere at a rapid rate. It is likely songbirds will avoid the <br />azea adjacent to and for some distance from the exhausters. <br />Uplands in the project area aze composed of mature oak with similaz stmcture and age class. The <br />reclaimed pads and roads in this community type would result in an increased amount of edge and <br />increased vegetative diversity. Species that favor oak and eazly successional grass-forb and shrub <br />seedling communities are expected to increase their utilization of these areas following reclamation. <br />Wildlife habitat in Sylvester Gulch would be compromised by construction of a classified yeaz-round <br />access road. This would establish along-term access pazalleling the stream channel for its entire <br />length (approximately 3 miles). In the project area, riparian aeeas and related drainages provide the <br />Emdronmenta/ Arrerrment <br />U"uvl VUUai G.'G/E.r/DM S/~/03E1 uIDt <br />~i vor.s <br />