My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL42877
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL42877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:11:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:02:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/11/2002
Doc Name
EA Coal Methane Drainage Project -Panels 16-24
From
MWH for USDA Forest Service
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coal Methane Drainage Projert - Panek 16-24 Wert E!k Mine • Page 3-12 <br />more intensive management systems have been implemented. Within the project azea, stringer <br />meadows and riparian habitats are the highest productivity habitats. These habitats have a large <br />number of palatable woody plants and high yield and diversity of grasses and forbs. Elk and livestock <br />both favor these habitats and localized areas can show signs of relatively high use. <br />The project azea has been mapped by the CDOW as elk winter range. Forest Plan designated <br />Management Area SA, Big Game Winter Range, occurs within and adjacent to the project azea. The <br />south and southwest facing slopes and drainages aze most likely to be used during mild winters. <br />Transition and winter range on National Forest lands, private lands, and BLM are generally in a <br />declining condition due to natural aging (lack of disturbance has resulted in forage and browse in a <br />mature, decadent stage) and the effects of human development in some of the most productive range <br />sites. <br />Human activities within the analysis area are highest during the big game hunting seasons (August <br />through October). Human activities in proximity to the azea have included road and trail <br />construction in conjunction with coal exploration and mining since the late 1960's, grazing on the <br />Dry Fork allotment, operation of the Minnesota Reservoir and Deep Creek ditch system, and recent <br />methane drainage activities beginning in spring of 2001. Widespread use of ATV's in the last 10 years <br />has resulted in user-created roads and trails and an overall increase in road and trail densities. These <br />routes often tun along drainages or ridges, which are important elk travel corridors and security azeas. <br />Moderate levels of human activity occur in the Minnesota Creek drainage. USFS traffic counter data <br />from 1998 -2000 indicates use in the analysis area is low to moderate in summer months, then <br />doubles during September and October. In 2000 there was an overall decrease in use of the area <br />from 1999. Some of the decrease in use may be attributed to MCC activities in the azea. Summer use <br />of the area is expected to increase as the community of Paonia continues to grow and residents use <br />public lands for recreation. <br />Human activity on public lands can cause elk to move to lower elevations eazlier than normal <br />(CDOW 1990). Studies indicate that elk respond to human activity by moving out of active drainages <br />to other portions of their home range. This behavior is more pronounced the longer the duration of <br />the acdviry. Big game impacts can be reduced by conning activities to a single drainage at a time, <br />completing the activities in the shortest time possible, and scheduling activities during periods when <br />elk aze not present. Displacement of elk from public to private lands reduces hunting opportunities <br />and creates conflicts with landowners and livestock. Displacement from selected habitats over time is <br />a serious impact to elk. <br />Vehicle traffic on forest roads establishes a pattern of habitat use in which areas neazest the road are <br />not fully utilized by elk. With only two miles of road per square mile, more than half of the available <br />elk habitat can be affected (Lyon, 1983). Currendy, road densities are approximately 2.2 miles per <br />square mile within the cumulative analysis azea and 4.35 miles per square mde within the project azea. <br />During the hunting seasons ells seek security azeas where geography, topography, vegetation, or a <br />combination of these factors, will hold elk under the stress of hunting. The effectiveness of these <br />areas is influenced by their size, type of cover, topographic chazacteristics, and distance fzom roads. <br />Potential elk security areas occur in the Sunset Tzail, Coal Creek Mesa, Muddy Fork, and Ravens <br />Gulch areas. Elk populations within the boundazies of the West Elk Data Analysis Unit (DAU) E-52, <br />which includes CDOW Game Management Units 53 and 54, averaged around 4,176 for the last five <br />years. The current CDOW population objective for this DAU is 2,350 elk. <br />Mule deer are found throughout the general azea in both forested and open shrub habitats such as <br />oakbmsh, sagebrush, and mixed browse habitats. The CDOW has mapped this area as summer range <br />for mule deer. Mule deer fawning occurs near the upper limits of their winter range, in lower <br />elevation brush fields, and forest ecotones. No specific fawning grounds have been identified in the <br />project area. Winter range for mule deer is not mapped within the analysis azea. Current deer <br />Environmental Arte.rrmenl <br />Y~:IOP/Mrv. Gd GlFil/n~iil~l0)F.I utFt <br />J/S/OSd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.