My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41483
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:09:29 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:13:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995097
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INTRODUCTION GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND LIST OF MINERALS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />table" where oxygenated groundwater, circulating through the <br />breccias and other relatively open cavities and fractures of the <br />carbonates of the Aspen district, removed the sulfides and other <br />chemicals originally combined with it, leaving behind massive <br />deposits of native silver. One native silver "nugget" reached <br />nearly 2,000 pounds in weight. Elsewhere, extensive deposits of <br />delicate, intricately-interwoven "wire" silver were found. <br />Unfortunately, production records are not sufficiently detailed to <br />determine how much native vs. combined silver was produced. <br />In a few areas, including the top of an unnamed raise <br />immediately inside the portal of the Smuggler No. 2 tunnel, the <br />supergene zone extends virtually to the surface. In this specific <br />location, thin glacial sands and gravels were enriched by <br />circulating groundwater and even surface samples are anomalously <br />high in typical ore minerals. <br />Mining Methods <br />The author has found virtually no detailed accounts of the <br />mining methods utilized in the Aspen district. However, from <br />general descriptions that are available (see BIBLIOGRAPHY) and <br />examinations of workings in both Aspen mountain (Compromise tunnel <br />and associated workings) and in the Smuggler No. 1, No. 2, and <br />Clark tunnels, as well as interconnecting workings, it is apparent <br />that the mines were developed in a manner typical of the late 19th <br />and early 20th centuries in moderately- to steeply-dipping <br />deposits. <br />Tunnels and shafts were developed, mostly in "country rock," <br />to access the deposits which were reached by crosscuts or drifts. <br />Raises were driven from the relatively level tunnels, drifts, or <br />crosscuts, usually in ore, and expanded into stopes from which most <br />of the ores were produced. Stoping methods and dimensions varied <br />widely. Because of the general competence of the hanging- and <br />foot-wall rocks, massive timbering such as used in other districts <br />was apparently unusual in the Aspen district. Indeed, stopes with <br />dimensions of up to 60 ft. in width, 250 ft. in length, and over <br />1,500 ft. in depth have stood open, without timbering, for nearly <br />100 years. In all likelihood slabbing from level-connected raises, <br />from the top down, creating a shrinkage stope from which ore was <br />loaded through chutes into ore cars in the openings below, or in a <br />similar fashion from raises as opened upward, were the most typical <br />mining methods. Regardless of variations, development openings in <br />country rock were as small as possible, to minimize the necessity <br />of handling non-paying rock. Stopes, and drifts, raises, and other <br />openings in ore were limited as much as possible to profitable <br />" Today the approximate level of the Roaring Fork River but, of <br />course, in the past not necessarily as low or as high. <br />Bruce A. Collins - xxvi - SNUCCLeR BISLIOGRAPSx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.