My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41363
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:08:58 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:09:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/14/1990
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_1 • <br />MID-TERM REVIEW <br />KING COAL MINE <br />FILE N0. C-81-035 <br />This document presents the results of the Division's Mid-Term Review of <br />National King Coal Incorporated's Kina Coal Mine. The mid-term review was <br />conducted to fulfill the requirements of Rule 2.06.2(9), 2.06.3(4), 2.06.5(31, <br />2.06.7(5), 2.08.3 and 3.02.2(4). <br />Rules 2.06.2, 2.06.3, 2.06.5 and 2.06.7, require that experimental practices, <br />mountain top removal variances, variances from AOC, and variances for delay in <br />contemporaneous reclamation requirements in combined surface and underground <br />mining operations be reviewed by the Division where applicable during the <br />Mid-Term Review. None of the special categories listed above apply to <br />operations at the King Coal Mine. <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, <br />prior to its mid-term (2 1/2 years). Based on this review, for good cause <br />shown, the Division may require reasonable revision or modification of the <br />permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act and Regulations. <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the financial <br />warranty and the terms of acceptance of the financial warranty every <br />2 1/2 years. Based on this review, for good cause shown, the Division may <br />require adjustment of the financial warranty to ensure compliance with the Act <br />and Regulations. <br />This Mid-Term Review consisted of a detailed review of the King Coal Mine <br />Permit and Findings document to identify any items that may have been <br />overlooked during the initial review. The Division also reviewed all <br />subsequent revisions to ensure that all permit commitments and conditions were <br />being followed. Problems and observations from past inspection reports and <br />enforcement actions were also considered. <br />Section I -'History <br />Renewal No. 1 to Permit C-81-035 was issued to National King Coal, Inc. (NKC) <br />effective August 18, 1987. The proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance <br />was issued on July 9, 1987. The mine has been active during the period, with <br />coal production remaining relatively constant. <br />There were no stipulations attached to the renewal permit. All stipulations <br />attached to the original, 1982 permit had been resolved prior to issuance of <br />the renewal permit. <br />Section II - Revisions to the Permit <br />Since permit issuance, the Division has approved one permit revision and four <br />minor revisions to the permit. These revisions are listed below in <br />chronological order. A second permit revision was submitted and determined to <br />be complete shortly before this midterm document was prepared. No decision on <br />the second permit revision has yet been made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.