Laserfiche WebLink
-44- <br />If adequate subsidence protection plans can be designed, then loss of <br />surface water would result only from the first two sources, increased <br />infiltration and loss of springs. This runoff is not entirely lost to <br />the hydrologic system. It would temporarily become a part of the <br />ground water system and would eventually reemerge to the surface. It <br />is difficult to predict where this water would reemerge. It could <br />re-emerge downstream in the same drainage (the Minnesota Creek system) <br />or it could reemerge along the North Fork of the Gunnison. In the <br />latter case, the impact upon water users located along Minnesota Creek <br />is potentially the greatest. In either case, water users located below <br />the confluence of Minnesota Creek and the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />should not be affected. The following stipulation is required by the <br />Division to insure that the applicant analyzes and uses the data <br />gathered under requirements put forth in previous stipulations. <br />Stipulation No. 10 <br />WEST ELK CDAL COt~ANY OR ANY SUCCEEDING OPERATOR OF THE MT. GUNNISON <br />NUMBER 1 MINE, MUST ~Ni'INUE TO SUBMIT TO THE DNISION, AN ANNUAL <br />HYDROLOGIC REPORT. THIS REPORT SHALL INCLUDE AN ANALYSIS OF ALL <br />HYDROLOGIC DATA GA'P[-IERED DURING THE YEAR, AN PSSFSSMENT OF TES IMPACTS <br />OF MINING DURING THE YEAR, AND AN ESTIMATE OF THE PROJECP IMPACTS OF <br />MINING IN THE FOLSOWING YEARS. THIS REPORT SHALL ASSESS THE IMPACTS OF <br />MINING ON THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF WATER IN SURFACE STREAMS, <br />SPRINGS, GROUND WATER AQUIFERS, MINE INFLOW AND MINE DISCHARGES. <br />Impacts on Surface Waters <br />The Division, based on review of the permit applications for the mining <br />operations considered in this assessment, has identified several <br />possible affects of mining on surface water quality and quantity . <br />Surface water quality might be affected by the discharge of mine water <br />from underground workings or by seepage from waste rock or coal refuse <br />piles to the stream - alluvial aquifer system. The underground mining <br />operations, by altering ground water flaw, reversing hydraulic <br />gradients, and through subsidence effects, may deplete springs and <br />seeps or stream flows. In addition, the withdrawal of surface water <br />for mine usage may deplete surface flows. <br />Two other possible surface water effects, increased infiltration in the <br />areas overlying underground workings and increased erosion from <br />disturbed areas, were briefly considered but then deleted from further <br />analysis. Although subsidence might logically increase infiltration <br />rates in an undermined watershed (and therefore decrease runoff], the <br />Division is unaware of any literature documenting that this effect <br />actually occurs. <br />Surface flow from disturbed areas would carry higher sediment <br />concentrations than natural runoff. However, Rule 4.05.2 requires that <br />all disturbed flow pass through a properly designed sediment control <br />pond. Effluent from the pond is required to meet NPDES limitations <br />prior to discharge. During operation, monitoring and inspection by the <br />