Laserfiche WebLink
The overburden proposed as non-toxic cover at Red Canyon is clayey and <br />moderately saline (Table 2.04 .9(1)(b)-4: Site No. 0-6 and 0-7). The <br />material is clay, with one EC value of 5.6 (0-7). SAR values are very <br />low and pH ranges from moderately acidic (4.6) to slightly alkaline <br />(8.0). The material is conditionally suitable for non-toxic refuse cover <br />(see also C.S.U. soils analytical evaluation, Figure 2.04.9(1)(d)-1) if <br />acidic materials are neutralized. This material was replaced to a depth <br />of four feet over the underground development waste pile, and is the only <br />area proposed to have topsoil replacement. All previously disturbed <br />areas will use overburden as a substitute for topsoil. <br />V. Sealing of Drilled Holes and Underground Openings <br />Grand Mesa Coal Company is prudently managing holes, wells and <br />piezometere prior to sealing them. The Division requires that each <br />hole, well or other underground opening be capped, sealed, <br />backfilled, or otherwise properly managed (4.07.3). <br />VI. Use of Exnlosivee <br />A. Use of explosives at the Red Canyon Mine was minimal during <br />underground operatione_ There are currently no explosives used at <br />the site; therefore this section does not apply (4.08). <br />VII. Disposal of Excess Snoil <br />A. The Red Canyon Mine will not require a disposal area for excess spoil <br />(4.09) . <br />VIII. Coal Mine Waste Banks <br />A. The Division approved the use of a disposal area for underground <br />development waste. This waste dump is located east of the creek in <br />an area of previously mined strip pits. The proposed design <br />specified that the pile would move eastward into undisturbed land. <br />Original designs proposed the placement of 30,000 yd' per year, for <br />a total of 159,000 tons of underground development waste. <br />Ultimately, 50,000 yards were placed at the site. <br />B. The Division has reviewed the design for the fill and proposes to <br />approve it. The design specifications for Che underground <br />development waste pile may be found in Appendices B and D of the <br />permit application (4.09.1(2)). <br />C. The Division proposes to approve the use of a straw mulch to control <br />erosion, promote growth, and increase moisture retention on the <br />reclaimed underground development waste pile (4.09.1(4)). <br />D. The Division proposes to approve the location of the disposal area <br />(4.09.1(6)). <br />E. The applicant submitted a plan for disposal of Hotchkiss Coal Yard <br />waste on July 25, 1984, at the approved underground waste development <br />disposal area within the permit boundary. GMCC accepted 7,000 tons <br />during the summer of 1984. The applicant had demonstrated that <br />disposal of such materials would not adversely affect water quality <br />or flow, vegetation, public health, or stability of the disposal area <br />based on hydrologic, geotechnical, physical, and chemical analyses. <br />Therefore, the Division approved disposal of these materials <br />(4.10.1(2)). <br />The Red Canyon underground development waste pile has no sub-drainage <br />system. The lower section of the waste pile was constructed in an <br />abandoned pit. T'he Division finds that this alternative ensures the <br />19 <br />