Laserfiche WebLink
~L <br />STATE OF III III III III IIII III <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanment of Natural Resources <br />1317 Sherman 51., Room 215 L <br /> <br />Denver, ColoraAo 80203 ~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 ~ <br />I <br />FAX: (3031832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br /> <br />June 12, 1995 Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> lame 5 Lx hheaA <br />Coors Energy Company Eteculive Director <br />Mr. Donald W. MacDonald, Mgr. Energy Services Mic hael B. LOng <br />P.O. BOX 467 Dinsion Dueaor <br />Golden, Colorado 80402 <br />RE: Keenesburg Strip Mine, File No. C-81-028 <br />Dear Mr. MacDonald: <br />The Division has received two items of correspondence from Coors <br />Energy Company (CEC) relating to the disposal of ash at the <br />Keenesburg Strip Mine. The first is a letter dated March 15, 1995 <br />stating CEC's position concerning the submittal of a technical <br />revision with respect to changing the coal source and waste ash. <br />The second is a cover letter and report of analysis dated May 4, <br />1995 for the waste ash from the new coal source. Both letters are <br />in response to Minor Revision 27 (MR-27) which was approved to <br />dispose of test burn ash at the Keenesburg Strip Mine for a 60 day <br />period. One requirement of the MR-27 approval was to perform the <br />required laboratory analyses as outlined in the current mining and <br />reclamation permit and the second was to submit a technical <br />revision if a permanent switch in the coal supply was implemented. <br />With respect to the first letter, MR-27 was approved for a 60 day <br />test burn only. Please be advised that disposing of the new coal <br />source ash beyond the 60 -day period approved in MR-27 may result in <br />an enforcement action against CEC. If CEC made a decision to <br />switch coal suppliers, a technical revision was to be submitted, <br />reviewed and approved to reflect the new coal source. CEC's letter <br />indicates their belief that a technical revision is not necessary <br />based on the definition of a technical revision and the fact that <br />the permit is silent on the source of the coal (which it is not, <br />see TR-13). The letter goes on to say that the permit neither <br />requires or prohibits the disposal of ash from any specific source. <br />The DMG mining and reclamation permit does contain restrictions and <br />requirements for the disposal of ash at the Keenesburg Mine <br />including providing laboratory analyses of ash from any new coal <br />source. In addition, the special use permit issued by Weld County <br />was required as part of the approval for TR-13 and clearly states <br />that if the coal source is changed, review and approval of the new <br />