My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41027
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:00:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:00:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/19/1984
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mid-Term Review <br />King Coal Mine - Permit No. C-035-81 <br />Introduction <br />This document presents the results of the Division's mid-term review of <br />the National King Coal, Ines, King Coai Mine. This mid-term review was <br />conducted to fulfill the requirements of Rule 2.08.3, 2.06.2(9), 2.06.3(4), <br />2.06.5(3) 2.06.1(5) and 3.02.2(4). <br />Rule 2.08.3 requires that the Division conduct a review of each permit issued, <br />prior to its mid-term (2 1/2 years). Based on this review, for good cause <br />shown, the Division may require reasonable revision or modification of the <br />permit provisions to ensure compliance with the Act and Regulations. <br />Rules 2.06.2, 3, 5, and 7 requires that experimental practices, mountaintop <br />removal variances, variances from AOC, and variances from contemporaneous <br />reclamation be reviewed by the Division where applicable. The King Coal Mine <br />permit does not have any operations under these categories. <br />Rule 3.02.2(4) requires that the Division review the amount of the bond and <br />the terms of acceptance of the bond every 2 1/2 years. <br />The mid-term review consisted of a aetailed review of the King Coal Mine <br />permit application. The Division also reviewed all subsequent revisions and <br />stipulation responses to ensure that all permit commitments and conditions <br />were being followed. Hydroloyic monitoring data was reviewed in conjunction <br />with the review of the application to assess the adequacy of the monitoring <br />plan and discussion of hydrologic impacts. Problems and observations from <br />past inspections were also considered while conducting the review. <br />This docwnent is organized as follows: Section I includes a summary of our <br />decision to require revisions with regard to the mid-term review required <br />under Rule 2.08.3. Section IA includes a listing by category of what items <br />need to be revised and a rationale for requiring these revisions. Section IB <br />presents a summary of the status of the stipulations attached to the King Coal <br />Mine permit C-035-81 and any revisions required with regard to the <br />stipulations. Section II presents the results of the bond review required <br />under Rule 3.02.2(4). Section III is a summation of this review which <br />highlights the major items of concern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.