Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~i <br />A. <br />lIANAGElIENT REQUIRENENTS <br />i~. Upaeta <br />a) Effect of an Dpaet <br /> <br />PART II <br />Page 13 of 19 <br />An upset constitutes an affirmtive defense to an action <br />brought for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if <br />the requirements of paragraph b of this section are met. (No <br />determination made during administrative review of claims that <br />noncompliance vas caused by upset, and before an action for <br />noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to <br />judicial revlev.) <br />b) Conditions Necessary fora Demonstration of Upset <br />A permittee who viahea to establish the affirmative defense of <br />upset shall demonstrate through properly signed contemporaneous <br />operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: <br />(i) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify <br />the specific cause(s) of the upseE; and <br />(11) The permitted facility was at the time being properly <br />operated; and <br />(111) The permittee submitted notice of the upset ae required <br />in Part II.A.3. of this permit (24-hour notice); and <br />(iv) The permittee complied with any remedial measures <br />required under Section 122.7 (d) of the federal <br />regulations. <br />c) Burden of Proof <br />In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to <br />establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. <br />t3. Removed Substances <br />Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of <br />treatment or control of wastewaters shall be properly disposed of in <br />a manner such as to prevent any pollutant from :such materials from <br />entering waters of the State. <br />Code: i - 27 Date: 1-84, revised 12-88 <br />