My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL40417
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL40417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:59:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/12/1993
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~• <br />Waste water from the coal wash plant was recycled back into the <br />coal washing facility after fines settled out in upper and <br />lower settling ponds. This water recycling system increased <br />the total dissolved solids in the water through exposure of the <br />water to fines and through evaporation. The ponds that were <br />used in this water recycling system are unlined and are located <br />on or are hydrologically adjacent to the North Thompson Creek <br />alluvium. Thus, these ponds posed a potential for the <br />degradation of the alluvial water quality directly and, <br />indirectly, the surface water quality of North Thompson Creek. <br />Alluvial monitoring well D-lA below the refuse pile has a water <br />chemistry markedly different from that in North Thompson <br />Creek. The high levels of both total dissolved solids, between <br />3498 and 3982 mg/l, and sulfates, between 1900 and 2700 mg/l, <br />indicate the refuse pile sediment pond and unlined settling <br />ponds may in part have impacted the quality of alluvial ground <br />water and quality of surface water. The applicant states that <br />this poor water quality is due to alluvial ground water flow <br />over the Mancos Shale. However, alluvial water quality <br />analyses of the Coal Creek alluvial ground water show water <br />qualities favorably comparing to the surface water qualities in <br />spite of the fact that there are greater exposures of Mancos <br />Shale in the Coal Creek Drainage Basin. <br />The water used at the loadout site was pumped from wells <br />completed in the Roaring fork alluvium. The withdrawal of this <br />ground water was small and covered under a plan of augmentation <br />which minimized impact to the quantity of alluvial ground <br />water. There has been no evidence of any adverse impacts to <br />the ground water quality at the loadout site. <br />2. Surface Water <br />One of the potential impacts associated with most mining <br />operations is increased sediment loads to receiving streams. <br />This would be caused by surface disturbance which increases <br />soil loss. Unnatural sediment loads to receiving streams could <br />be detrimental in the following ways: <br />a. Fish reproduction, growth rate, and life span could be <br />reduced. <br />b. Stream temperature could be increased. <br />c. Stream channel capacity could be reduced. <br />d. Drainage structures and downstream irrigation systems could <br />be clogged. <br />e. Alluvial water tables could be raised. <br />f. Floodplains could be altered. <br />g. Sediment may carry toxic substances that could change water <br />quality. <br />To minimize the potential impacts of sediment loads at this <br />mine, the operator constructed a sediment control system. This <br />system treats all mine discharges and surface disturbed runoff <br />-!6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.