Laserfiche WebLink
<br />manganese, ammonia, sulfate, zinc, and total dissolved solids. <br />A field measurement of pH by DMG staff obtained a pH value of <br />2.5 for the No. 2 Mine water. It must be noted that this mine <br />i5 abandoned and "pre-law"; it is not proposed to be reopened <br />or permitted under this proposed decision. <br />During mining, water that collects in the mine has limited <br />exposure to the affected strata prior to discharge to the <br />surface. Thus, there is little degradation of water quality. <br />However, upon completion of mining, there is a potential for <br />the formation of acidic and toxic mine waters. This <br />degradation of water quality would result from the prolonged <br />exposure of water to fractured roof strata and to the exposed <br />coal and floor strata once the mine pumps are shut off. <br />However, the water quality data for mine water discharges since <br />the cessation of pumping at the North Thompson Creek Mines <br />demonstrates that the discharge water has remained slightly <br />alkaline. Elevated iron concentrations in the mine discharge <br />water are treated before the water is discharged to North <br />Thompson Creek. <br />Ground water quality in overlying and underlying aquifers may <br />become degraded upon closure of the mine through vertical <br />communication of strata caused by faults and fractures. The <br />overlying and underlying aquifers are currently not put to <br />beneficial use and the potential for their future utilization <br />is limited by the difficulty in developing water wells in these <br />strata. Owing to these factors, the mines will not materially <br />damage the ground water of any water user through vertical <br />migration of degraded mine waters. <br />The coal processing wastes from the wash plant are combustible, <br />acid-forming, and potentially toxic. Owing to the.nature of <br />these coal processing wastes, the coal refuse pile was <br />constructed to minimize exposure of wastes to air, surface <br />water, and ground water. The exposure to these wastes is being <br />limited through (1> compacting the waste in two-foot lifts, <br />(2> covering the refuse pile with one foot of non-toxic cover, <br />(3) providing permanent surface diversion of surface runoff <br />from undisturbed areas around the pile, (4) collecting and <br />treating all surface drainage flowing over the pile during <br />construction and reclamation, and (5> benching and sloping the <br />pile such that erosion and infiltration of the final pile is <br />minimized. <br />The refuse pile was constructed on top of thin alluvium of the <br />old stream channel which supplies drainage of ground water <br />beneath the pile. The pile was constructed over the relatively <br />impermeable Mancos Shale Formation and not over any aquifer. <br />Therefore, the impacts of the refuse pile on the quality of <br />ground water should be minimized and should not cause material <br />damage to any ground water currently in use. <br />_.5_ <br />