My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-05-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2001054
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M2001054
>
2003-05-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M2001054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2021 12:32:51 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:27:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001054
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/27/2003
Doc Name
Response to Written Complaint
From
DMG
To
Concerned Neighbors of Briadveil Gravel Pit
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />May 19, 2003 <br />~~ Concerned Neighbors of Bridalveil Gravel Pit ~ <br />~ c/o Andy and Rhonda Palmer <br />PO Box 1315 <br />Ouray, CO 81427 <br />Re: <br />/i t,, ~ <br />Bridalveil Pit, Permit M-2001-054, Response to Written Complaint. <br />Dear Concerned Neighbors of Bridalveil Gravel Pit, <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECIAM ATION <br />MI NIN G•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Ezecutive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Acing Division Director <br />I have received the faxed and mailed copies of the written complaint you sent to me, concerning the site named <br />above. During the week prior to receiving your letter, I inspected this site and found many of the same types of <br />conditions which you listed in your letter. Of the many topics you mentioned, a few of them fall within the <br />jurisdiction of this agency. However, I will try to respond to all of the points you raised in your letter in the <br />pazagraphs below. <br />This agency issued this permit to Bridalveil Construction in October, 2002. I under stand that, since the site is <br />located within the Town of Ouray limits, Bridalveil Construction also went through a permitting process with the <br />town. I am not familiar with the requirements or limitations the town may have placed on Bridalveil Construction, <br />nor of any commitments or promises that may have been made outside the context of the state reclamation permit. <br />My knowledge of what may or may not occur at that site is limited to that which is set forth in the reclamafion <br />permit issued by the Division of Minerals and Geology, and my comments are necessarily limited to that. <br />Before an operaton is issued a permit by this agency, adequate mining and reclamation plans must be reviewed and <br />approved, and an adequate bond posted for the approved amount of disturbance. <br />The approved mining plan for this permit allows three benches to be excavated on the slope, plus the screening and <br />stockpiling of material onsite. Other activifies, such as establishing a stable runoff chammel (on the property) for <br />Bridalveil Creek and construction of a sediment control pond, were also included in the mining plan. The approved <br />post-mining land use, which the reclamation plan addresses, is industrial-commercial. Your statement regarding <br />the future commercial use of the excavated benches matches my understanding of his plan. <br />All state reclamation permits must include a defined boundary around the permitted area, with all approved <br />activities to be carried out inside that boundary. The applicant defined the permit boundary as the property <br />boundary. During my inspection I noticed that the boundary was fairly well marked, considering the uneven terrain <br />and timber on much of it. Though I did not observe disturbance beyond the boundary, I did observe mining-related <br />disturbance up to the property line (permit boundary) on the north side. There were several statements made in the <br />permit application regarding buffer strips of undisturbed land along the edges of the permit. While this office does <br />not always have authority over what non-mining activities are carried out in such buffer areas, there is authority <br />over activities which aze carried out in support of the permitted mining operation, since all such disturbances must <br />be adequately bonded. <br />M ~cFi~F~ <br />qr r (y//~J~j~ <br />Q%Y%Rj~n 0/ ~ 'W <br />Migo~f8 HntlCep%og~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.