GENERAL39367 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-13- Several concerns were raised by the Division and the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) during the review of the cultural resources survey. The applicant was asked to define the extent of the survey, explain sample selecting procedures and supply a review of the areas historic development. The applicant satisfactorily addressed these three items. Two sites identified during the cultural resources survey are located within the Munger Canyon Mine plan boundaries. Site 5GF742, a pictograph, is recommended as being eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, while 5FG743, an old homestead, is not. The homestead is adjacent to the haul road for the mine, with the pictograph further removed from the road on the canyon wall. Neither site will be disturbed by the proposed operation. Because of this, and since 5GF742 is not actually listed on the National Re ister of Historic Places, a mitigation plan is not required (see Rule 2.05/64)). An additional cultural resource study was prepared for Salt Creek Mining Company in 1983 by the Grand River Institute, entitled "Cultural Resources Inventory of Several Proposed Roads and Storage Areas Associated with the McClane and Munger Canyons Plan/Permit Areas in Garfield County, Colorado" (GRI Project No. 8292). This study can be found in Appendix Is of Volume VI of the application. The survey covered areas associated with the proposed central facilities area permit revision. Three prehistoric (5GF1147, 5GF741, and 5GF742) and three historic (5GF742, 5GF326, and 5GF879) sites were identified. Five sites fall within the project boundaries (5GF1147, 5GF742, 5GF743, 5GF326, and 5GF879) and three (5GF147, 5GF742, and 5GF879) of the five sites are located on Federal lands administered by the BLM. The SHPO has concurred with the BLM that site 5GF741 will not be impacted by the proposed project; that sites 5GF743, 5GF326, and 5GF879 are not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and therefore require no further work, and finally that sites5GF1147 and 5GF742 are eligible for nomination to the NRHP. A mitigation plan for the two eligible sites has been developed by the BLM and concurred with by the SHPO on April 11, 1984. The applicant, as part of the special stipulations attached to BLM Lease Agreement No. C-36791, has committed to performing mitigation measures for archaeological sites 5GF1147 and 5GF742 in accordance with the approved mitigation plan. Mitigation activities will be performed prior to construction activity in the area and will be coordinated by and through the BLM Grand Junction Resource Area Archaeologist. A copy of the approved BLM Lease Agreement is included as Appendix GS-11 within the amended permit application. Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2) (e), the Division finds the applicant will not adversely affect any publicly owned park or place listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section.