My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39289
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/4/1993
Doc Name
TATUM PROPERTY CONCERNS BASIN RESOURCES INC GOLDEN EAGLE MINE PN C81-013
From
DMG
To
JIM TATUM & ASSOC
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•~ <br />J <br />-2 <br />Further, Stipulation No. 28 of the Golden Eagle permit document states <br />that "the permittee shall perform a survey of five potentially <br />affected adobe constructed houses", some being the Tatum buildings, <br />"pursuant to Rule 2.05.6(6)(c)(i)(D)". This rule states that <br />monitoring of structures is required to begin "one month prior to the <br />initiation of mining beneath any established monument or structure." <br />Because mining has yet to reach underneath any of the Tatum buildings <br />identified in Stipulation No. 28, this part of the subsidence <br />monitoring program has yet to begin. <br />Your third question asked how your well and adobe buildings were <br />listed in the application. <br />Exhibit 10 of the Golden Eagle Mine permit document contains the <br />results of a Water User Survey conducted on May 9 and 10, 1984. NEw <br />Appendix 5 of the 1988 Annual Hydrology Report contains an updated E L k <br />1988 version of that survey. Table 2 of that survey, entitled EkN )~ <br />"Results of Windmill Survey", lists a Windmill No. 10. This windmill <br />was described ae being in Santistevan Canyon, not owned by the <br />operator, and not functioning. Figure 1 of the 1988 survey shows the <br />location of Windmill No. 10, and it appears to be yours. Windmills <br />are also identified on Map 7, entitled "Regional. Hydrology", received <br />by the Division on January 25, 1990. Your windmill does not appear on <br />that map. <br />Your adobe buildings are shown on Map 16, Structure Inventory. These <br />buildings are also referred to in Stipulation No. 28, previously <br />mentioned in this letter. <br />Your last question asked for the baseline hydrologic data that was <br />used to characterize the condition of your water well, presumably your <br />windmill, prior to drilling the airshaft and underground mining. The <br />only reference to your windmill that could be found in our current <br />permit documents was its listing in Table 2 of the Results of Windmill <br />Survey, previously mentioned in this letter. Baseline hydrologic data <br />characterizing the condition of your water well does not appear to <br />exist in the Golden Eagle Mine permit document at this time. <br />If you have any further questions, or if you wish to submit data that <br />could possibly refute any existing information in the Golden Eagle <br />permit application, please feel free to contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Environmental Protect ion Specialist <br />JJD/ern <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, DMG <br />Steve Renner, DMG <br />Steve Brown, Department of Law <br />M:\oss\ern\tatum.jjd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.