My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39289
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:46 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/4/1993
Doc Name
TATUM PROPERTY CONCERNS BASIN RESOURCES INC GOLDEN EAGLE MINE PN C81-013
From
DMG
To
JIM TATUM & ASSOC
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nalu ral Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FA%:13031672-0106 <br />November 4, 1993 <br />Mr. Jim Tatum <br />Law Offices of Jim Tatum and Associates <br />8703 Bonhomme <br />ov cow <br />ti~ r <br />Nc <br />~g$ <br />• ~ re i6 ~ <br />Ray Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Dimaor <br />Houston, TX 77074 <br />RE: Tatum Property Concerns, Basin Resources, Inc., Golden Eagle <br />Mine, Permit No. C-81-013 <br />Dear Mr. Tatum: <br />The Division received your letter of October 12, 1993, on <br />October 18, 1993. We wish to take this opportunity to respond to your <br />questions. <br />Your first question asked whether the requirements of <br />Rule 2.05.6(6)(b) concerning worst possible subsidence consequences <br />were reviewed during the Division's original review of the <br />Golden Eagle Mine permit, and if not, why not. <br />Rule 2.05.6(6)(b) requires a description of the worst possible <br />consequences which subsidence, if it were to occur, could have on <br />structures and renewable resource lands identified per <br />Rule 2.05.6(6)(a)(ii)(B). This description was provided. <br />In Exhibit 24 of the Golden Eagle permit application, it is stated by <br />the operator that "no subsidence is expected in the renewable resource <br />area", due to room and pillar mining proposed with an extraction rate <br />of less than 50~. Exhibit 24 contains calculations showing that such <br />a mining operation would be expected to cause "minimal to negligible" <br />subsidence over the room and pillar areas. Because the Tatum Property <br />is in the area of renewable resource lands, namely the <br />Purgatoire River alluvium, the worst possible consequence which <br />subsidence was expected to have beneath the areas of room and pillar <br />mining was "minimal to negligible". Because the Tatum buildings are <br />however currently not situated over any room and pillar mined areas, <br />and lie beyond any potential angle of draw, no subsidence effects are <br />expected to affect these structures. <br />Your second question asked why the Division has not enforced <br />Rule 2.05.6(c), which requires a subsidence monitoring program. <br />The Division has enforced this rule. A subsidence monitoring program <br />per Rule 2.05.6(6)(c) for the Purgatoire River alluvium has been in <br />effect since the first quarter of 1988 and is still in effect. This <br />survey is being conducted two miles east of your structures, and just <br />south of the Purgatoire River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.