My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL39079
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL39079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:59:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/25/2001
From
US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pikeview Quarry Environmental Assessment Page 45 <br />and asphalt rock, and about 844,000 tons for road base) from private land that would not <br />otherwise be accessible because of slope instability problems. The production rate would <br />' remain the same and the life of the mine would be extended to 12 years (the last two <br />years would only include reclamation activities). <br />' 4.3.3 Alternative C: Enhanced Reclamation without Layback <br /> Under the enhanced reclamation without Layback alternative, enhanced reclamation <br /> would occur in addition to the base reclamation, and no federal lands would be affected. <br /> This alternative would not allow for the reclamation of steep slopes. Instead, topsoil <br /> would be accumulated on existing slopes to provide relative stabilization. <br />' i <br /> Under this alternat <br />ve, the quarry would have the same limestone production as <br /> under Alternative A. <br />' <br /> 4.4 Physical Environment <br /> In this section, the impacts of the different alternatives on the physical environment <br /> are discussed. It is important to note that the impacts on soils, hydrology and water <br /> quality are interconnected, although they are presented in separate sub-sections. The best <br />' management practices presented in the Hydrology section are thus applicable to all the <br /> above mentioned types of impacts. <br />' 4.4.1 Geology and Soils <br />' 4.4.1.1 Alternative A: No Action <br /> Under Alternative A, geologic landforms and soil conditions would remain as <br /> they aze described in the Affected Environment section of this EA. However, without the <br />' Layback soil losses due to slope wasting, wind and water erosion processes would <br /> continue to occur due to previous mining and to the lack of reclamation works in the site. <br /> As the limestone rock faces continues to slough off the face of the cliffs and steep <br /> cut slopes, reclamation techniques are not effective at stabilizing the slope. Techniques <br /> such as rock staining, camouflage or rock bolting create hazazd during their application, <br /> and are not permanent due to slope wasting. <br /> The neighboring soils on National Forest System lands could eventually be <br /> affected by continued erosion at the western boundary of the quarry. <br /> 4.4.1.2 Alternative B: The Proposed Action <br />' l <br /> Under Alternative B, <br />andforms would be altered in two phases: during the <br /> production phase, granite and limestone extraction would alter the existing slope profile <br /> of the mine, and areas above the mine to the West, on National Forest System lands. No <br />' unique land forms or rock formations would be affected. The grade of cut slopes would <br />' Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, 1002 Walnut Street Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80302 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.